A Polyphonic Debate on Social Equity Budgeting

Bruce D McDonald, Laurence Ferry, Sean A McCandless, Meagan M Jordan, Ileana Steccolini, John R Bartle, Thomas Ahrens, Jim Haslam, Philip G Joyce, Tobias Polzer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper is polyphonic (i.e., a debate involving multiple perspectives) and highlights emerging interdisciplinary thoughts on past, current, and future social equity budgeting (SEB). We present a vision for the field and emphasize the potential impact of this paper. We hope to enliven debates regarding context, underpinning philosophies, and methods, thus fostering a greater theoretical and practical reconsideration of SEB. The impact of this paper is significant, as it leads to a fundamental rethinking of SEB and related research, profoundly influencing the field. To do so, this paper has brought together 10 international scholars to foster an interdisciplinary approach regarding views and strategies. The richness of looking at a plurality of perspectives enables exploring developments that open the potential for a much greater theoretical and practical reconsideration of SEB and related research. The paper shows that while there is much convergence on the importance of ongoing research on gender, race, and class, there can also be more research on areas such as SEB's philosophical, theoretical, and empirical underpinnings that need further development.

Original languageEnglish
JournalPublic Administration
DOIs
Publication statusAccepted/In press - 2024

Keywords

  • budgeting
  • critical race theory
  • gender-responsive budgeting
  • social equity
  • social equity budgeting

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Public Administration

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A Polyphonic Debate on Social Equity Budgeting'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this