TY - JOUR
T1 - A Polyphonic Debate on Social Equity Budgeting
AU - McDonald, Bruce D
AU - Ferry, Laurence
AU - McCandless, Sean A
AU - Jordan, Meagan M
AU - Steccolini, Ileana
AU - Bartle, John R
AU - Ahrens, Thomas
AU - Haslam, Jim
AU - Joyce, Philip G
AU - Polzer, Tobias
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 The Author(s). Public Administration published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - This paper is polyphonic (i.e., a debate involving multiple perspectives) and highlights emerging interdisciplinary thoughts on past, current, and future social equity budgeting (SEB). We present a vision for the field and emphasize the potential impact of this paper. We hope to enliven debates regarding context, underpinning philosophies, and methods, thus fostering a greater theoretical and practical reconsideration of SEB. The impact of this paper is significant, as it leads to a fundamental rethinking of SEB and related research, profoundly influencing the field. To do so, this paper has brought together 10 international scholars to foster an interdisciplinary approach regarding views and strategies. The richness of looking at a plurality of perspectives enables exploring developments that open the potential for a much greater theoretical and practical reconsideration of SEB and related research. The paper shows that while there is much convergence on the importance of ongoing research on gender, race, and class, there can also be more research on areas such as SEB's philosophical, theoretical, and empirical underpinnings that need further development.
AB - This paper is polyphonic (i.e., a debate involving multiple perspectives) and highlights emerging interdisciplinary thoughts on past, current, and future social equity budgeting (SEB). We present a vision for the field and emphasize the potential impact of this paper. We hope to enliven debates regarding context, underpinning philosophies, and methods, thus fostering a greater theoretical and practical reconsideration of SEB. The impact of this paper is significant, as it leads to a fundamental rethinking of SEB and related research, profoundly influencing the field. To do so, this paper has brought together 10 international scholars to foster an interdisciplinary approach regarding views and strategies. The richness of looking at a plurality of perspectives enables exploring developments that open the potential for a much greater theoretical and practical reconsideration of SEB and related research. The paper shows that while there is much convergence on the importance of ongoing research on gender, race, and class, there can also be more research on areas such as SEB's philosophical, theoretical, and empirical underpinnings that need further development.
KW - budgeting
KW - critical race theory
KW - gender-responsive budgeting
KW - social equity
KW - social equity budgeting
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85206183305&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85206183305&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/padm.13039
DO - 10.1111/padm.13039
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85206183305
SN - 0033-3298
JO - Public Administration
JF - Public Administration
ER -