TY - JOUR
T1 - A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial of Nutritional Supplementation During Acute Illness
AU - Gariballa, Salah
AU - Forster, Sarah
AU - Walters, Stephen
AU - Powers, Hilary
PY - 2006/8
Y1 - 2006/8
N2 - Purpose: The study tested whether nutritional support of older patients during acute illness leads to a clinical benefit. Methods: In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, we randomly assigned 445 hospitalized patients aged 65 to 92 years to receive either a normal hospital diet plus 400 mL oral nutritional supplements (223 subjects) or a normal hospital diet plus a placebo (222 subjects) daily for 6 weeks. The composition of the supplement was such as to provide 995 kcal of energy and 100% of the Reference Nutrient Intakes for vitamins and minerals for a healthy older person. Patients had three assessments: at baseline, at 6 weeks, and at 6 months post-randomization. Outcome measures were 6 months of disability, non-elective readmission and length of hospital stay, discharge destination, morbidity, and mortality. Results: Randomization to the supplement group led to a significant improvement in nutritional status. Over 6 months, 65 patients (29%) in the supplements group were readmitted to the hospital compared with 89 patients (40%) in the placebo group (adjusted hazard ratio 0.68 [95% confidence interval 0.49-0.94]). The mean length of hospital stay was 9.4 days in the supplements group compared with 10.1 days in the placebo group. Thirty-two people (14%) died in the supplement group compared with 19 people (9%) in the placebo group at 6 months (adjusted hazard ratio 1.65 [95% confidence interval, 0.93-2.92]). Conclusion: Oral nutritional supplementation of acutely ill patients improved nutritional status and led to a statistically significant reduction in the number of non-elective readmissions.
AB - Purpose: The study tested whether nutritional support of older patients during acute illness leads to a clinical benefit. Methods: In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, we randomly assigned 445 hospitalized patients aged 65 to 92 years to receive either a normal hospital diet plus 400 mL oral nutritional supplements (223 subjects) or a normal hospital diet plus a placebo (222 subjects) daily for 6 weeks. The composition of the supplement was such as to provide 995 kcal of energy and 100% of the Reference Nutrient Intakes for vitamins and minerals for a healthy older person. Patients had three assessments: at baseline, at 6 weeks, and at 6 months post-randomization. Outcome measures were 6 months of disability, non-elective readmission and length of hospital stay, discharge destination, morbidity, and mortality. Results: Randomization to the supplement group led to a significant improvement in nutritional status. Over 6 months, 65 patients (29%) in the supplements group were readmitted to the hospital compared with 89 patients (40%) in the placebo group (adjusted hazard ratio 0.68 [95% confidence interval 0.49-0.94]). The mean length of hospital stay was 9.4 days in the supplements group compared with 10.1 days in the placebo group. Thirty-two people (14%) died in the supplement group compared with 19 people (9%) in the placebo group at 6 months (adjusted hazard ratio 1.65 [95% confidence interval, 0.93-2.92]). Conclusion: Oral nutritional supplementation of acutely ill patients improved nutritional status and led to a statistically significant reduction in the number of non-elective readmissions.
KW - Acute illness
KW - Clinical outcome
KW - Nutritional supplements
KW - Readmission
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33746703714&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33746703714&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.amjmed.2005.12.006
DO - 10.1016/j.amjmed.2005.12.006
M3 - Article
C2 - 16887416
AN - SCOPUS:33746703714
SN - 0002-9343
VL - 119
SP - 693
EP - 699
JO - American Journal of Medicine
JF - American Journal of Medicine
IS - 8
ER -