TY - GEN
T1 - Adaptive boosting and bootstrapped aggregation based ensemble machine learning methods for photovoltaic systems output current prediction
AU - Omer, Zahi M.
AU - Shareef, Hussain
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 IEEE.
PY - 2019/11
Y1 - 2019/11
N2 - Photovoltaics output current prediction received great deal of attention in recent years, due to the high penetration level of PV utilization. The intermittent nature of PV systems, in addition to the fast-varying irradiance levels, provoked the need for fast, accurate and reliable forecasting techniques. Machine Learning (ML) methods have been proven to effectively solve regression-based prediction problems. ML methods that utilize multiple models to construct decision trees are called Ensemble Machine Learning (EML) algorithms. This paper presents a comparison study of two EML methods namely; AdaBoost and Random Forest for photovoltaics application. A dataset of fast varying environmental conditions has been employed and the terminal current of the experimental setup has been augmented based on the mathematical model and the use of an evolutionary algorithm. The mathematical model has been examined for several irradiance and temperature levels and adjusted based on the manufacturer datasheet. Random Forest overall absolute error distribution had the lowest mean and standard deviation. Results shows the superior performance of Random Forest over AdaBoost in terms of absolute error, on the contrary, AdaBoost absolute error distribution is scattered with larger quartiles limits. Random Forest overall absolute error distribution had the lowest mean of 0.27% with a standard deviation of 0.91%, however, AdaBoost absolute error mean was as high as 34.5% with a standard deviation of 15.8% relative to the mathematical model. Accurate predictions can be integrated in an EML based maximum power point tracking (MPPT) scheme.
AB - Photovoltaics output current prediction received great deal of attention in recent years, due to the high penetration level of PV utilization. The intermittent nature of PV systems, in addition to the fast-varying irradiance levels, provoked the need for fast, accurate and reliable forecasting techniques. Machine Learning (ML) methods have been proven to effectively solve regression-based prediction problems. ML methods that utilize multiple models to construct decision trees are called Ensemble Machine Learning (EML) algorithms. This paper presents a comparison study of two EML methods namely; AdaBoost and Random Forest for photovoltaics application. A dataset of fast varying environmental conditions has been employed and the terminal current of the experimental setup has been augmented based on the mathematical model and the use of an evolutionary algorithm. The mathematical model has been examined for several irradiance and temperature levels and adjusted based on the manufacturer datasheet. Random Forest overall absolute error distribution had the lowest mean and standard deviation. Results shows the superior performance of Random Forest over AdaBoost in terms of absolute error, on the contrary, AdaBoost absolute error distribution is scattered with larger quartiles limits. Random Forest overall absolute error distribution had the lowest mean of 0.27% with a standard deviation of 0.91%, however, AdaBoost absolute error mean was as high as 34.5% with a standard deviation of 15.8% relative to the mathematical model. Accurate predictions can be integrated in an EML based maximum power point tracking (MPPT) scheme.
KW - Adaptive boosting
KW - Ensemble machine learning
KW - Photovoltaics
KW - Regression decision trees.
KW - Single diode model
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85086302269&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85086302269&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1109/AUPEC48547.2019.211856
DO - 10.1109/AUPEC48547.2019.211856
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:85086302269
T3 - 2019 29th Australasian Universities Power Engineering Conference, AUPEC 2019
BT - 2019 29th Australasian Universities Power Engineering Conference, AUPEC 2019
PB - Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
T2 - 29th Australasian Universities Power Engineering Conference, AUPEC 2019
Y2 - 26 November 2019 through 29 November 2019
ER -