Abstract
This article examines the Private Finance Initiative (PFI) accounting standard setting process from an institutional theory perspective. It identifies three forms of institutional pressures and examines their impact on the PFI standard setting process. 'Coercive' pressure, exerted by the Treasury, and 'normative' pressure, exerted by the accounting profession, were influential in shaping respondents' comments on the PFI accounting Exposure Draft (ED). It is argued that the views of the accounting profession seem to have prevailed in the PFI standard setting process. This might stem from its institutional legitimacy and close ties with the Accounting Standards Board (ASB). In line with its broader policy objective of adopting private sector business practices in the public sector, the Treasury has eventually 'acquiesced' to the final PFI accounting standard issued by the ASB.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 69-94 |
| Number of pages | 26 |
| Journal | Public Management Review |
| Volume | 7 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Mar 2005 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- ASB
- Accounting standard setting
- Institutional theory
- Private finance initiative
- Treasury
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Management Information Systems
- Management of Technology and Innovation
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'An institutional theory perspective on the UK's Private Finance Initiative (PFI) accounting standard setting process'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS