TY - JOUR
T1 - Artificial Intelligence Implementation in Healthcare
T2 - A Theory-Based Scoping Review of Barriers and Facilitators
AU - Chomutare, Taridzo
AU - Tejedor, Miguel
AU - Svenning, Therese Olsen
AU - Marco-Ruiz, Luis
AU - Tayefi, Maryam
AU - Lind, Karianne
AU - Godtliebsen, Fred
AU - Moen, Anne
AU - Ismail, Leila
AU - Makhlysheva, Alexandra
AU - Ngo, Phuong Dinh
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 by the authors.
PY - 2022/12
Y1 - 2022/12
N2 - There is a large proliferation of complex data-driven artificial intelligence (AI) applications in many aspects of our daily lives, but their implementation in healthcare is still limited. This scoping review takes a theoretical approach to examine the barriers and facilitators based on empirical data from existing implementations. We searched the major databases of relevant scientific publications for articles related to AI in clinical settings, published between 2015 and 2021. Based on the theoretical constructs of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR), we used a deductive, followed by an inductive, approach to extract facilitators and barriers. After screening 2784 studies, 19 studies were included in this review. Most of the cited facilitators were related to engagement with and management of the implementation process, while the most cited barriers dealt with the intervention’s generalizability and interoperability with existing systems, as well as the inner settings’ data quality and availability. We noted per-study imbalances related to the reporting of the theoretic domains. Our findings suggest a greater need for implementation science expertise in AI implementation projects, to improve both the implementation process and the quality of scientific reporting.
AB - There is a large proliferation of complex data-driven artificial intelligence (AI) applications in many aspects of our daily lives, but their implementation in healthcare is still limited. This scoping review takes a theoretical approach to examine the barriers and facilitators based on empirical data from existing implementations. We searched the major databases of relevant scientific publications for articles related to AI in clinical settings, published between 2015 and 2021. Based on the theoretical constructs of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR), we used a deductive, followed by an inductive, approach to extract facilitators and barriers. After screening 2784 studies, 19 studies were included in this review. Most of the cited facilitators were related to engagement with and management of the implementation process, while the most cited barriers dealt with the intervention’s generalizability and interoperability with existing systems, as well as the inner settings’ data quality and availability. We noted per-study imbalances related to the reporting of the theoretic domains. Our findings suggest a greater need for implementation science expertise in AI implementation projects, to improve both the implementation process and the quality of scientific reporting.
KW - AI implementation
KW - CFIR
KW - artificial intelligence
KW - deep learning
KW - diagnosis
KW - eHealth
KW - healthcare
KW - machine learning
KW - prognosis
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85143701067&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85143701067&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3390/ijerph192316359
DO - 10.3390/ijerph192316359
M3 - Review article
C2 - 36498432
AN - SCOPUS:85143701067
SN - 1661-7827
VL - 19
JO - International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
JF - International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
IS - 23
M1 - 16359
ER -