Assessment of Potentially Toxic Metals (PTMs) Pollution, Ecological Risks, and Source Apportionment in Urban Soils from University Campuses: Insights from Multivariate and Positive Matrix Factorisation Analyses

Understanding pollution levels, ecological health risks, and sources of potentially toxic metals (PTMs) in the soil from university campuses is critical for assessing environmental safety. Soil samples were collected from 12 locations across urban parks and green areas at Sohag University in Egypt. The samples were processed and analysed for heavy metals, including iron (Fe), manganese (Mn), cobalt (Co), nickel (Ni), chromium (Cr), lead (Pb), zinc (Zn), copper (Cu), and cadmium (Cd). Pollution levels were evaluated using indices such as the pollution index (PI), pollution load index (PLI), geo-accumulation index (I_geo), and enrichment factors (EFs). Among the pollution indices, the EFs showed the highest sensitivity in detecting anthropogenic contributions, particularly for Cd, Pb, and Cr. Spatial distribution maps and multivariate statistical analyses, including correlation matrix (CM), principal component analysis (PCA), and cluster analysis (CA), were applied to identify the relationships between PTMs and soil properties, and source apportionment was performed using positive matrix factorisation (PMF). The results indicated that Mn, Ni, and Co were primarily geogenic, whereas Pb, Zn, Cr, and Cd showed higher concentrations, suggesting moderate-to-significant anthropogenic pollution. Pb and Cd pose considerable ecological risks, whereas other metals such as Cr and Cu exhibit moderate ecological threats. The non-carcinogenic and carcinogenic risks to the students were within safe limits, as defined by United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) threshold values. Source apportionment using PMF identified five main sources of PTMs: industrial and anthropogenic activities (30.0%), traffic emissions (25.0%), natural soil processes (20.0%), agricultural practices (15.0%), and mixed industrial traffic sources (10.0%). These findings emphasise the importance of controlling anthropogenic activities to ensure a safer campus environment.