TY - JOUR
T1 - Biophysical determinants of front-crawl swimming at moderate and severe intensities
AU - Ribeiro, João
AU - Toubekis, Argyris G.
AU - Figueiredo, Pedro
AU - De Jesus, Kelly
AU - Toussaint, Huub M.
AU - Alves, Francisco
AU - Vilas-Boas, João P.
AU - Fernandes, Ricardo J.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 Human Kinetics, Inc.
PY - 2017/2
Y1 - 2017/2
N2 - Purpose: To conduct a biophysical analysis of the factors associated with front-crawl performance at moderate and severe swimming intensities, represented by anaerobic-threshold (vAnT) and maximal-oxygen-uptake (vVO2max) velocities. Methods: Ten high-level swimmers performed 2 intermittent incremental tests of 7 × 200 and 12 × 25 m (through a system of underwater push-off pads) to assess vAnT, and vVO2max, and power output. The 1st protocol was videotaped (3D reconstruction) for kinematic analysis to assess stroke frequency (SF), stroke length (SL), propelling effciency (ηP), and index of coordination (IdC). VO2 was measured and capillary blood samples (lactate concentrations) were collected, enabling computation of metabolic power. The 2nd protocol allowed calculating mechanical power and performance effciency from the ratio of mechanical to metabolic power. Results: Neither vAnT nor vVO2max was explained by SF (0.56 ± 0.06 vs 0.68 ± 0.06 Hz), SL (2.29 ± 0.21 vs 2.06 ± 0.20 m), ηP (0.38 ± 0.02 vs 0.36 ± 0.03), IdC (-12.14 ± 5.24 vs-9.61 ± 5.49), or metabolic-power (1063.00 ± 122.90 vs 1338.18 ± 127.40 W) variability. vVO2max was explained by power to overcome drag (r =.77, P ≤.05) and ηP (r =.72, P ≤.05), in contrast with the nonassociation between these parameters and vAnT; both velocities were well related (r =.62, P ≤.05). Conclusions: The biomechanical parameters, coordination, and metabolic power seemed not to be performance discriminative at either intensity. However, the increase in power to overcome drag, for the less metabolic input, should be the focus of any intervention that aims to improve performance at severe swimming intensity. This is also true for moderate intensities, as vAnT and vVO2max are proportional to each other.
AB - Purpose: To conduct a biophysical analysis of the factors associated with front-crawl performance at moderate and severe swimming intensities, represented by anaerobic-threshold (vAnT) and maximal-oxygen-uptake (vVO2max) velocities. Methods: Ten high-level swimmers performed 2 intermittent incremental tests of 7 × 200 and 12 × 25 m (through a system of underwater push-off pads) to assess vAnT, and vVO2max, and power output. The 1st protocol was videotaped (3D reconstruction) for kinematic analysis to assess stroke frequency (SF), stroke length (SL), propelling effciency (ηP), and index of coordination (IdC). VO2 was measured and capillary blood samples (lactate concentrations) were collected, enabling computation of metabolic power. The 2nd protocol allowed calculating mechanical power and performance effciency from the ratio of mechanical to metabolic power. Results: Neither vAnT nor vVO2max was explained by SF (0.56 ± 0.06 vs 0.68 ± 0.06 Hz), SL (2.29 ± 0.21 vs 2.06 ± 0.20 m), ηP (0.38 ± 0.02 vs 0.36 ± 0.03), IdC (-12.14 ± 5.24 vs-9.61 ± 5.49), or metabolic-power (1063.00 ± 122.90 vs 1338.18 ± 127.40 W) variability. vVO2max was explained by power to overcome drag (r =.77, P ≤.05) and ηP (r =.72, P ≤.05), in contrast with the nonassociation between these parameters and vAnT; both velocities were well related (r =.62, P ≤.05). Conclusions: The biomechanical parameters, coordination, and metabolic power seemed not to be performance discriminative at either intensity. However, the increase in power to overcome drag, for the less metabolic input, should be the focus of any intervention that aims to improve performance at severe swimming intensity. This is also true for moderate intensities, as vAnT and vVO2max are proportional to each other.
KW - Coordination
KW - Energy expenditure
KW - Kinematics
KW - Power
KW - Propelling effciency
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85017645961&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85017645961&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1123/ijspp.2015-0766
DO - 10.1123/ijspp.2015-0766
M3 - Article
C2 - 27248207
AN - SCOPUS:85017645961
SN - 1555-0265
VL - 12
SP - 241
EP - 246
JO - International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance
JF - International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance
IS - 2
ER -