TY - JOUR
T1 - Clarify Sit-to-Stand Muscle Synergy and Tension Changes in Subacute Stroke Rehabilitation by Musculoskeletal Modeling
AU - Wang, Ruoxi
AU - An, Qi
AU - Yang, Ningjia
AU - Kogami, Hiroki
AU - Yoshida, Kazunori
AU - Yamakawa, Hiroshi
AU - Hamada, Hiroyuki
AU - Shimoda, Shingo
AU - Yamasaki, Hiroshi R.
AU - Yokoyama, Moeka
AU - Alnajjar, Fady
AU - Hattori, Noriaki
AU - Takahashi, Kouji
AU - Fujii, Takanori
AU - Otomune, Hironori
AU - Miyai, Ichiro
AU - Yamashita, Atsushi
AU - Asama, Hajime
N1 - Funding Information:
This research was supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Numbers 19H05729, 19K22799, and 18H01405.
Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2022 Wang, An, Yang, Kogami, Yoshida, Yamakawa, Hamada, Shimoda, Yamasaki, Yokoyama, Alnajjar, Hattori, Takahashi, Fujii, Otomune, Miyai, Yamashita and Asama.
PY - 2022/3/14
Y1 - 2022/3/14
N2 - Post-stroke patients exhibit distinct muscle activation electromyography (EMG) features in sit-to-stand (STS) due to motor deficiency. Muscle activation amplitude, related to muscle tension and muscle synergy activation levels, is one of the defining EMG features that reflects post-stroke motor functioning and motor impairment. Although some qualitative findings are available, it is not clear if and how muscle activation amplitude-related biomechanical attributes may quantitatively reflect during subacute stroke rehabilitation. To better enable a longitudinal investigation into a patient's muscle activation changes during rehabilitation or an inter-subject comparison, EMG normalization is usually applied. However, current normalization methods using maximum voluntary contraction (MVC) or within-task peak/mean EMG may not be feasible when MVC cannot be obtained from stroke survivors due to motor paralysis and the subject of comparison is EMG amplitude. Here, focusing on the paretic side, we first propose a novel, joint torque-based normalization method that incorporates musculoskeletal modeling, forward dynamics simulation, and mathematical optimization. Next, upon method validation, we apply it to quantify changes in muscle tension and muscle synergy activation levels in STS motor control units for patients in subacute stroke rehabilitation. The novel method was validated against MVC-normalized EMG data from eight healthy participants, and it retained muscle activation amplitude differences for inter- and intra-subject comparisons. The proposed joint torque-based method was also compared with the common static optimization based on squared muscle activation and showed higher simulation accuracy overall. Serial STS measurements were conducted with four post-stroke patients during their subacute rehabilitation stay (137 ± 22 days) in the hospital. Quantitative results of patients suggest that maximum muscle tension and activation level of muscle synergy temporal patterns may reflect the effectiveness of subacute stroke rehabilitation. A quality comparison between muscle synergies computed with the conventional within-task peak/mean EMG normalization and our proposed method showed that the conventional was prone to activation amplitude overestimation and underestimation. The contributed method and findings help recapitulate and understand the post-stroke motor recovery process, which may facilitate developing more effective rehabilitation strategies for future stroke survivors.
AB - Post-stroke patients exhibit distinct muscle activation electromyography (EMG) features in sit-to-stand (STS) due to motor deficiency. Muscle activation amplitude, related to muscle tension and muscle synergy activation levels, is one of the defining EMG features that reflects post-stroke motor functioning and motor impairment. Although some qualitative findings are available, it is not clear if and how muscle activation amplitude-related biomechanical attributes may quantitatively reflect during subacute stroke rehabilitation. To better enable a longitudinal investigation into a patient's muscle activation changes during rehabilitation or an inter-subject comparison, EMG normalization is usually applied. However, current normalization methods using maximum voluntary contraction (MVC) or within-task peak/mean EMG may not be feasible when MVC cannot be obtained from stroke survivors due to motor paralysis and the subject of comparison is EMG amplitude. Here, focusing on the paretic side, we first propose a novel, joint torque-based normalization method that incorporates musculoskeletal modeling, forward dynamics simulation, and mathematical optimization. Next, upon method validation, we apply it to quantify changes in muscle tension and muscle synergy activation levels in STS motor control units for patients in subacute stroke rehabilitation. The novel method was validated against MVC-normalized EMG data from eight healthy participants, and it retained muscle activation amplitude differences for inter- and intra-subject comparisons. The proposed joint torque-based method was also compared with the common static optimization based on squared muscle activation and showed higher simulation accuracy overall. Serial STS measurements were conducted with four post-stroke patients during their subacute rehabilitation stay (137 ± 22 days) in the hospital. Quantitative results of patients suggest that maximum muscle tension and activation level of muscle synergy temporal patterns may reflect the effectiveness of subacute stroke rehabilitation. A quality comparison between muscle synergies computed with the conventional within-task peak/mean EMG normalization and our proposed method showed that the conventional was prone to activation amplitude overestimation and underestimation. The contributed method and findings help recapitulate and understand the post-stroke motor recovery process, which may facilitate developing more effective rehabilitation strategies for future stroke survivors.
KW - EMG normalization
KW - muscle synergy
KW - muscle tension
KW - musculoskeletal modeling
KW - sit-to-stand (STS)
KW - stroke
KW - subacute rehabilitation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85127697663&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85127697663&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3389/fnsys.2022.785143
DO - 10.3389/fnsys.2022.785143
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85127697663
SN - 1662-5137
VL - 16
JO - Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience
JF - Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience
M1 - 785143
ER -