TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparative Evaluation of Five Assays for Detection of Carbapenemases with a Proposed Scheme for Their Precise Application
AU - Khalifa, Hazim O.
AU - Okanda, Takashi
AU - Abd El-Hafeez, Amer A.
AU - El Latif, Amera Abd
AU - Habib, Ahmed G.K.
AU - Yano, Hisakazu
AU - Kato, Yasuyuki
AU - Matsumoto, Tetsuya
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Association for Molecular Pathology and American Society for Investigative Pathology
PY - 2020/9
Y1 - 2020/9
N2 - The escalating problem of the dissemination of carbapenemase-producing bacteria (CPB) has gained worldwide attention. The prompt diagnosis of CPB and precise identification of carbapenemases are imperative to enable specific antibiotic therapy and control the spread of these bacteria. The present study was designed to assess the performance of five important assays for the detection of carbapenemases. The modified carbapenem inactivation method (mCIM), CARBA-5, GeneXpert Carba-R, BD MAX Check-Points CPO, and GeneFields CPE assays were evaluated with an international collection of 159 bacterial isolates, including 93 CPB and 66 non-CPB isolates. The overall accuracy/sensitivity/specificity for carbapenemase detection were 100% (95% CI, 97.7%–100%)/100% (95% CI, 96.1%–100%)/100% (95% CI, 94.6%–100%) for mCIM, 98.7% (95% CI, 95.5%–99.9%)/97.9% (95% CI, 92.5%–99.7%)/100% (95% CI, 94.6%–100%) for CARBA-5, 96.9% (95% CI, 92.8%–99%)/95.7% (95% CI, 89.4%–98.8%)/98.5% (95% CI, 91.8%–99.9%) for GeneXpert Carba-R, 94.3% (95% CI, 89.5%–97.4%)/90.3% (95% CI, 82.4%–95.5%)/100% (95% CI, 94.6%–100%) for BD MAX Check-Points CPO, and 86.2% (95% CI, 79.8%–91.1%)/77.4% (95% CI, 67.6%–85.5%)/98.5% (95% CI, 91.8%–100%) for GeneFields CPE. Interestingly, mCIM and CARBA-5 assays showed 100% accuracy/sensitivity/specificity for detection of the target genes. Furthermore, all the other assays showed comparable high accuracy (96.9% to 100%), sensitivity (100%), and specificity (96.4% to 100%) for the detection of the target genes. On the basis of these results, a new scheme was proposed for their efficient application. These results confirmed the high sensitivity of the evaluated assays, and the proposed scheme is reliable and improves the overall sensitivity and specificity of the assays.
AB - The escalating problem of the dissemination of carbapenemase-producing bacteria (CPB) has gained worldwide attention. The prompt diagnosis of CPB and precise identification of carbapenemases are imperative to enable specific antibiotic therapy and control the spread of these bacteria. The present study was designed to assess the performance of five important assays for the detection of carbapenemases. The modified carbapenem inactivation method (mCIM), CARBA-5, GeneXpert Carba-R, BD MAX Check-Points CPO, and GeneFields CPE assays were evaluated with an international collection of 159 bacterial isolates, including 93 CPB and 66 non-CPB isolates. The overall accuracy/sensitivity/specificity for carbapenemase detection were 100% (95% CI, 97.7%–100%)/100% (95% CI, 96.1%–100%)/100% (95% CI, 94.6%–100%) for mCIM, 98.7% (95% CI, 95.5%–99.9%)/97.9% (95% CI, 92.5%–99.7%)/100% (95% CI, 94.6%–100%) for CARBA-5, 96.9% (95% CI, 92.8%–99%)/95.7% (95% CI, 89.4%–98.8%)/98.5% (95% CI, 91.8%–99.9%) for GeneXpert Carba-R, 94.3% (95% CI, 89.5%–97.4%)/90.3% (95% CI, 82.4%–95.5%)/100% (95% CI, 94.6%–100%) for BD MAX Check-Points CPO, and 86.2% (95% CI, 79.8%–91.1%)/77.4% (95% CI, 67.6%–85.5%)/98.5% (95% CI, 91.8%–100%) for GeneFields CPE. Interestingly, mCIM and CARBA-5 assays showed 100% accuracy/sensitivity/specificity for detection of the target genes. Furthermore, all the other assays showed comparable high accuracy (96.9% to 100%), sensitivity (100%), and specificity (96.4% to 100%) for the detection of the target genes. On the basis of these results, a new scheme was proposed for their efficient application. These results confirmed the high sensitivity of the evaluated assays, and the proposed scheme is reliable and improves the overall sensitivity and specificity of the assays.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85089817262&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85089817262&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2020.05.012
DO - 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2020.05.012
M3 - Article
C2 - 32553883
AN - SCOPUS:85089817262
SN - 1525-1578
VL - 22
SP - 1129
EP - 1138
JO - Journal of Molecular Diagnostics
JF - Journal of Molecular Diagnostics
IS - 9
ER -