Comparison of pancreas-sparing duodenectomy (PSD) and pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) for the management of duodenal polyposis syndromes

R. Matthew Walsh, Toms Augustin, Essa M. Aleassa, Robert Simon, Kevin M. El-Hayek, Maitham A. Moslim, Carol A. Burke, James M. Church, Gareth Morris-Stiff

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

11 Citations (Scopus)


Background: Familial adenomatous polyposis affects primarily the colon but can also involve other locations within the gastrointestinal tract, including the duodenum. The aim of this study was to describe a single center experience with pancreas-sparing duodenectomy for familial adenomatous polyposis and to compare outcomes with pancreatoduodenectomy performed for duodenal polyp disease. Patients and Methods: A retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database identified patients who had undergone pancreas-sparing duodenectomy during the period 2001 to 2016. This population was matched 1:1 with a cohort of patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy for duodenal adenomas, both sporadic and familial, during the same time period. Baseline demographics and perioperative (short- and long-term) outcomes were compared. Results: A total of 88 patients were included; 44 in each group. The pancreas-sparing duodenectomy cohort was younger (52.6 vs 64.3 years; P <.001) and more patients had undergone prior colectomy (100% vs 32%; P <.001) or additional prior abdominal surgery (27% vs 9% (P <.001). Median operative times were greater for pancreatoduodenectomy (391 vs 460 min; P =.002). There was no difference in any of the early postoperative complications. There was 1 30-day mortality in the pancreatoduodenectomy group secondary to aspiration. Late acute pancreatitis was more common after pancreas-sparing duodenectomy (16% vs 0%; P =.012) and exocrine pancreatic insufficiency was more common after pancreatoduodenectomy (30% vs 11%; P =.034). Conclusion: Pancreas-sparing duodenectomy is a reasonable option for duodenal cancer prophylaxis in familial adenomatous polyposis with high-risk features. The perioperative safety profile is comparable to pancreatoduodenectomy done for similar indications, and pancreas-sparing duodenectomy has a favorable long-term with a lesser incidence of exocrine impairment.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)496-502
Number of pages7
JournalSurgery (United States)
Issue number4
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2019
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery


Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of pancreas-sparing duodenectomy (PSD) and pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) for the management of duodenal polyposis syndromes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this