TY - JOUR
T1 - Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion is associated with a better glycemic control than multiple daily insulin injections without difference in diabetic ketoacidosis and hypoglycemia admissions among Emiratis with Type 1 diabetes
AU - Almazrouei, Raya
AU - Sharma, Charu
AU - Afandi, Bachar
AU - Aldahmani, Khaled M.
AU - Aburawi, Elhadi H.
AU - Beshyah, Salem A.
AU - ElGhazali, Gehad
AU - Al Yafei, Zain
AU - Al-Rifai, Rami H.
AU - Alkaabi, Juma
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors acknowledge the College of Medicine and Health Sciences, United Arab Emirates University, for funding the project (Grant code 21M103-4 I.R.C.A).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Almazrouei et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
PY - 2022/9
Y1 - 2022/9
N2 - Aims To characterizes Emiratis patients with Type 1 diabetes (T1D) and compares outcomes between continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) versus multiple daily insulin injections (MDI) users. The WHO-Five Well-Being Index (WHO-5) score was used to screen for depression. Methods In this cross-sectional study; sociodemographic, clinical characteristics and insulin replacement regimens were collected on patients with T1D between 2015–2018. Results 134 patients with mean age of 20.9±7.5 years were included. Females constitute 56.7% and 50.7% had diabetes duration of >10 years. Diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) at presentation was reported in 46.3%. Average glycemic control over preceding 12months was satisfactory (less than 7.5%), suboptimal (7.5–9%), and poor (more than 9%) in 26.6%, 42.7% & 30.6% of the patients, respectively. Higher proportion of patients using CSII achieved satisfactory or suboptimal glycemic control compared to patients with MDI (P = 0.003). The latest median /IQR HbA1c was significantly lower (P = 0.041) in patients using CSII (8.2 /1.93%) compared to MDI (8.5/2.45%). There was no significant difference between two groups in DKA, severe hypoglycemia or total WHO-5 score. Conclusions CSII usage was associated with better glycemic control than MDI, although no difference in DKA and severe hypoglycemia. The overall glycemic control among Emiratis subjects with T1D is unsatisfactory and needs more rigorous patient counseling and education.
AB - Aims To characterizes Emiratis patients with Type 1 diabetes (T1D) and compares outcomes between continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) versus multiple daily insulin injections (MDI) users. The WHO-Five Well-Being Index (WHO-5) score was used to screen for depression. Methods In this cross-sectional study; sociodemographic, clinical characteristics and insulin replacement regimens were collected on patients with T1D between 2015–2018. Results 134 patients with mean age of 20.9±7.5 years were included. Females constitute 56.7% and 50.7% had diabetes duration of >10 years. Diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) at presentation was reported in 46.3%. Average glycemic control over preceding 12months was satisfactory (less than 7.5%), suboptimal (7.5–9%), and poor (more than 9%) in 26.6%, 42.7% & 30.6% of the patients, respectively. Higher proportion of patients using CSII achieved satisfactory or suboptimal glycemic control compared to patients with MDI (P = 0.003). The latest median /IQR HbA1c was significantly lower (P = 0.041) in patients using CSII (8.2 /1.93%) compared to MDI (8.5/2.45%). There was no significant difference between two groups in DKA, severe hypoglycemia or total WHO-5 score. Conclusions CSII usage was associated with better glycemic control than MDI, although no difference in DKA and severe hypoglycemia. The overall glycemic control among Emiratis subjects with T1D is unsatisfactory and needs more rigorous patient counseling and education.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85138458217&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85138458217&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0264545
DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0264545
M3 - Article
C2 - 36136973
AN - SCOPUS:85138458217
SN - 1932-6203
VL - 17
JO - PLoS One
JF - PLoS One
IS - 9 September
M1 - e0264545
ER -