TY - JOUR
T1 - Cost-Benefit Analysis of Crash Cushion Systems
AU - Schrum, Kevin D.
AU - De Albuquerque, Francisco D.B.
AU - Sicking, Dean L.
AU - Lechtenberg, Karla A.
AU - Faller, Ronald K.
AU - Reid, John D.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2015, Copyright © Taylor & Francis Group, LLC and The University of Tennessee.
PY - 2015/1/19
Y1 - 2015/1/19
N2 - Crash cushions vary in geometry and cost. In this study, crash cushions were categorized in three different categories: redirecting with repair costs greater than $1,000 (RGM), redirecting with repair costs less than $1,000 (RLM), and nonredirecting sacrificial (NRS). Typically, RGM systems are less expensive initially, but life-cycle costs are high. RLM systems typically reciprocate this trend. NRS crash cushions (e.g., sand barrels) are generally less expensive but require total replacement after a crash has occurred, which may be impractical at high-traffic volume locations. Due to limited funding, there is often a need to identify the most cost-effective crash cushion category for highway scenarios with different roadway, traffic, and roadside characteristics. This study was commissioned to determine benefit-cost ratios for each crash cushion category in a wide range of roadway and roadside characteristics using the probability-based encroachment tool, Roadside Safety Analysis Program. Only RGM and RLM systems were cost-effective for freeways and divided rural arterials, but all three categories competed against the unprotected condition on undivided rural arterials and local roads.
AB - Crash cushions vary in geometry and cost. In this study, crash cushions were categorized in three different categories: redirecting with repair costs greater than $1,000 (RGM), redirecting with repair costs less than $1,000 (RLM), and nonredirecting sacrificial (NRS). Typically, RGM systems are less expensive initially, but life-cycle costs are high. RLM systems typically reciprocate this trend. NRS crash cushions (e.g., sand barrels) are generally less expensive but require total replacement after a crash has occurred, which may be impractical at high-traffic volume locations. Due to limited funding, there is often a need to identify the most cost-effective crash cushion category for highway scenarios with different roadway, traffic, and roadside characteristics. This study was commissioned to determine benefit-cost ratios for each crash cushion category in a wide range of roadway and roadside characteristics using the probability-based encroachment tool, Roadside Safety Analysis Program. Only RGM and RLM systems were cost-effective for freeways and divided rural arterials, but all three categories competed against the unprotected condition on undivided rural arterials and local roads.
KW - RSAP
KW - benefit-cost
KW - crash cushions
KW - roadside
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84918560739&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84918560739&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/19439962.2013.846448
DO - 10.1080/19439962.2013.846448
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84918560739
SN - 1943-9962
VL - 7
SP - 1
EP - 19
JO - Journal of Transportation Safety and Security
JF - Journal of Transportation Safety and Security
IS - 1
ER -