Abstract
This evaluation adapts a previous Canadian analysis of upfront and sequential adjuvant AI strategies in postmenopausal women with breast cancer to a Belgian perspective and includes an extended aromatase inhibitor (AI) strategy. A Markov model calculated monthly costs and outcomes in a hypothetical cohort of postmenopausal women with early-stage breast cancer. Baseline event rates and hazard ratios were derived from the Arimidex, Tamoxifen Alone or in Combination trial, International Exemestane Study and MA.17 trials. The analysis took a Belgian healthcare payer perspective with a 20-year time horizon. Costs and outcomes were discounted by 3%. Costs are in 2005 Euros. The cost-utility of all three strategies was favourable (<€30,000 per QALY gained). Based on indirect comparisons using tamoxifen (TAM) alone as a common comparator, sequential TAM-AI was less costly and more effective than upfront or extended strategies. All three AI strategies were cost-effective alternatives to TAM alone, but sequential TAM-AI appears to be the economically preferred strategy.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 252-261 |
| Number of pages | 10 |
| Journal | Breast |
| Volume | 16 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Jun 2007 |
| Externally published | Yes |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Keywords
- Aromatase inhibitors
- Breast cancer
- Cost-utility analysis
- Tamoxifen
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Surgery
- Oncology
- Cancer Research
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Cost-utility of adjuvant hormone therapies with aromatase inhibitors in post-menopausal women with breast cancer: Upfront anastrozole, sequential tamoxifen-exemestane and extended tamoxifen-letrozole'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS