Abstract
The behavioral uncertainty response has grounded the study of animal metacognition and influenced the study of human psychophysics. However, the interpretation of this response is debated-especially whether it is a behavioral index of metacognition. The authors advanced this interpretation using the dissociative technique of response deadlines. Uncertainty responding, if it is higher level or metacognitive, should depend on a slower, more controlled decisional process and be more vulnerable to time constraints. Humans performed sparse-uncertain-dense or sparse-middle-dense discriminations in which, respectively, they could decline difficult trials or positively identify middle stimuli. Uncertainty responses were sharply and selectively reduced under a decision deadline, as compared to primary perceptual responses (i.e., "sparse," "middle," and "dense" responses). This dissociation suggests that the uncertainty response does reflect a higher-level, decisional response. It grants the uncertainty response a distinctive psychological role in its task and encourages an interpretation of this response as an elemental behavioral index of uncertainty that deserves continuing research.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 763-770 |
| Number of pages | 8 |
| Journal | Psychonomic Bulletin and Review |
| Volume | 21 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - May 2014 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Controlled processing
- Decision making
- Metacognition
- Response deadlines
- Uncertainty monitoring
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Developmental and Educational Psychology
- Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Decision deadlines and uncertainty monitoring: The effect of time constraints on uncertainty and perceptual responses'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS