TY - JOUR
T1 - Destinations of nursing and allied health graduates from two Australian universities
T2 - A data linkage study to inform rural placement models
AU - Sutton, Keith
AU - Depczynski, Julie
AU - Smith, Tony
AU - Mitchell, Eleanor
AU - Wakely, Luke
AU - Brown, Leanne J.
AU - Waller, Susan
AU - Drumm, Daniel
AU - Versace, Vincent L.
AU - Fisher, Karin
AU - Beauchamp, Alison
N1 - Funding Information:
We acknowledge the various contributions of non-author members of the project team, Professor Robyn Langham, Mrs Laura Major, Professor Jennifer May, Professor Darryl Maybery and Mr Mark Woodfield. The authors also acknowledge the contribution of the staff of the Faculties and Schools, the Strategic Planning and Performance Unit at the University of Newcastle, and University Planning and Statistics at Monash University for providing secure access to data and records.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 National Rural Health Alliance Ltd.
PY - 2021/4
Y1 - 2021/4
N2 - Objective: Combined, nursing and allied health constitute most of the Australian health workforce; yet, little is known about graduate practice destinations. University Departments of Rural Health have collaborated on the Nursing and Allied Health Graduate Outcomes Tracking to investigate graduate entry into rural practice. Design: Data linkage cohort study. Setting: Monash University and the University of Newcastle. Participants: Graduates who completed their degree in 2017 across seven disciplines. Main outcome measure(s): The outcome variable was Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency principal place of practice data. Explanatory variables included discipline, age, gender, location of origin, and number and duration of rural placements. Result: Of 1130 graduates, 51% were nurses, 81% females, 62% under 21 years at enrolment, 23% of rural origin, 62% had at least one rural student placement, and 23% had over 40 cumulative rural placement days. At the time of their second Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency registration, 18% worked in a ‘Rural principal place of practice.’ Compared to urban, rural origin graduates had 4.45 times higher odds ratio of ‘Rural principal place of practice.’ For graduates who had <20 cumulative rural placement days, compared to zero the odds ratio of ‘Rural principal place of practice’ was the same (odds ratio = 1.10). For those who had 20-40 rural placement days, the odds ratio was 1.93, and for >40 rural placement days, the odds ratio was 4.54). Conclusion: Rural origin and more rural placement days positively influenced graduate rural practice destinations. Outcomes of cumulative placements days may compare to immersive placements.
AB - Objective: Combined, nursing and allied health constitute most of the Australian health workforce; yet, little is known about graduate practice destinations. University Departments of Rural Health have collaborated on the Nursing and Allied Health Graduate Outcomes Tracking to investigate graduate entry into rural practice. Design: Data linkage cohort study. Setting: Monash University and the University of Newcastle. Participants: Graduates who completed their degree in 2017 across seven disciplines. Main outcome measure(s): The outcome variable was Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency principal place of practice data. Explanatory variables included discipline, age, gender, location of origin, and number and duration of rural placements. Result: Of 1130 graduates, 51% were nurses, 81% females, 62% under 21 years at enrolment, 23% of rural origin, 62% had at least one rural student placement, and 23% had over 40 cumulative rural placement days. At the time of their second Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency registration, 18% worked in a ‘Rural principal place of practice.’ Compared to urban, rural origin graduates had 4.45 times higher odds ratio of ‘Rural principal place of practice.’ For graduates who had <20 cumulative rural placement days, compared to zero the odds ratio of ‘Rural principal place of practice’ was the same (odds ratio = 1.10). For those who had 20-40 rural placement days, the odds ratio was 1.93, and for >40 rural placement days, the odds ratio was 4.54). Conclusion: Rural origin and more rural placement days positively influenced graduate rural practice destinations. Outcomes of cumulative placements days may compare to immersive placements.
KW - graduate tracking
KW - health workforce
KW - Rural Health
KW - tertiary education
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85104525091&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85104525091&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/ajr.12722
DO - 10.1111/ajr.12722
M3 - Article
C2 - 33876869
AN - SCOPUS:85104525091
SN - 1038-5282
VL - 29
SP - 191
EP - 200
JO - Australian Journal of Rural Health
JF - Australian Journal of Rural Health
IS - 2
ER -