Abstract
We combine nighttime lights data, official statistics, and new household survey data from northern Kenya in order to assess the impact of long-term refugee camps on host populations. The nighttime lights estimates show that refugee inflows increase economic activity in areas very close to Kakuma refugee camp: the elasticity of the luminosity index to refugee population is 0.36 within a 10 km distance from the camp center. In addition, household consumption within the same proximity to the camp is 25% higher than in areas farther away. Price, household survey, and official statistics suggest that the mechanisms driving this positive effect are increased availability of new employment and price changes in agricultural and livestock markets that are favorable to local producers.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 66-83 |
| Number of pages | 18 |
| Journal | Journal of Development Economics |
| Volume | 130 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Jan 2018 |
| Externally published | Yes |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Keywords
- Forced migration impacts
- Household data
- Nighttime lights
- Price analysis
- Refugee impacts
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Development
- Economics and Econometrics
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Do refugee camps help or hurt hosts? The case of Kakuma, Kenya'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS