Does the brain really outperform rent's rule?

This paper presents a thorough analysis of brain's connectivity from the perspective of the latest interpretation of Rent's rule, and using neurological data. While at first sight the brain might seem to outperform most of the known network topologies, a closer look will reveal that in fact it does not. From another perspective, the brain will seem to be just on the border of the latest range of Rent's rule values, while neurological data will show that it is almost right on the average. We conclude that, among quite a few network topologies, the crossbar (for very small sizes) and the cube connected cycles are highly competitive contenders for future brain-inspired nanoarchitectures.