TY - JOUR
T1 - Energy absorption and damage assessment of non-hybrid and hybrid fabric epoxy composite laminates
T2 - experimental and numerical study
AU - Stephen, Clifton
AU - Mourad, Abdel Hamid I.
AU - Shivamurthy, B.
AU - Selvam, Rajiv
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 The Authors
PY - 2021/9/1
Y1 - 2021/9/1
N2 - The energy absorption due to low-velocity impact on non-hybrid and hybrid (Kevlar-K, carbon-C, and glass-G) fabric reinforced epoxy composite laminates were studied by conducting standard drop weight tests. The experimental energy absorption results were compared with finite element analysis results. Both values were in good agreement with a maximum variation of about 6%. Kevlar/epoxy (K/K/K) specimen recorded the highest energy absorption (18.67 J) followed by Kevlar specimen sandwiched with glass fabric in the middle layer (K/G/K) (17.24 J). Specimens consisting of glass or carbon layers in the middle, sandwiched by Kevlar layers at the top and bottom (K/G/K and K/C/K) exhibited better energy absorption compared with laminates consisting of all three fabric reinforcements (K/C/G (13.38 J), G/C/K (16.11 J) and C/G/K (16.04 J), respectively). Considering the cost of these composite laminates, K/G/K composite offers 21% reduction in material cost when compared to K/K/K specimen and also offered reasonably enhanced impact resistance and energy absorption as compared to other hybrid composites. Hence, this data may be useful for developing cost effective impact resistant components for defense (protective helmets and body armor) and aerospace (aircraft body components) sectors. The morphological study of the drop weight impact tests revealed that, delamination, fiber breakage, fiber splitting, and matrix cracking are the major damage mechanisms observed in the study. The cost was found to be a critical factor to compare between the different composites.
AB - The energy absorption due to low-velocity impact on non-hybrid and hybrid (Kevlar-K, carbon-C, and glass-G) fabric reinforced epoxy composite laminates were studied by conducting standard drop weight tests. The experimental energy absorption results were compared with finite element analysis results. Both values were in good agreement with a maximum variation of about 6%. Kevlar/epoxy (K/K/K) specimen recorded the highest energy absorption (18.67 J) followed by Kevlar specimen sandwiched with glass fabric in the middle layer (K/G/K) (17.24 J). Specimens consisting of glass or carbon layers in the middle, sandwiched by Kevlar layers at the top and bottom (K/G/K and K/C/K) exhibited better energy absorption compared with laminates consisting of all three fabric reinforcements (K/C/G (13.38 J), G/C/K (16.11 J) and C/G/K (16.04 J), respectively). Considering the cost of these composite laminates, K/G/K composite offers 21% reduction in material cost when compared to K/K/K specimen and also offered reasonably enhanced impact resistance and energy absorption as compared to other hybrid composites. Hence, this data may be useful for developing cost effective impact resistant components for defense (protective helmets and body armor) and aerospace (aircraft body components) sectors. The morphological study of the drop weight impact tests revealed that, delamination, fiber breakage, fiber splitting, and matrix cracking are the major damage mechanisms observed in the study. The cost was found to be a critical factor to compare between the different composites.
KW - Energy absorption
KW - Finite element analysis
KW - Hybrid fabric epoxy composite
KW - Low-velocity impact
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85114296733&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85114296733&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jmrt.2021.08.108
DO - 10.1016/j.jmrt.2021.08.108
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85114296733
SN - 2238-7854
VL - 14
SP - 3080
EP - 3091
JO - Journal of Materials Research and Technology
JF - Journal of Materials Research and Technology
ER -