TY - JOUR

T1 - Erratum

T2 - MOVES - IV. Modelling the influence of stellar XUV-flux, cosmic rays, and stellar energetic particles on the atmospheric composition of the hot Jupiter HD 189733b (Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (2021) 502:4 (6201-6215) DOI: 10.1093/mnras/staa3989)

AU - Barth, P.

AU - Helling, Ch

AU - Stüeken, E. E.

AU - Bourrier, V.

AU - Mayne, N.

AU - Rimmer, P. B.

AU - Jardine, M.

AU - Vidotto, A. A.

AU - Wheatley, P. J.

AU - Fares, R.

N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Oxford University Press. All rights reserved.

PY - 2021/9/1

Y1 - 2021/9/1

N2 - The paper ‘MOVES – IV. Modelling the influence of stellar XUV-flux, cosmic rays, and stellar energetic particles on the atmospheric composition of the hot Jupiter HD 189733b’ was published in MNRAS, Volume 502, Issue 4, April 2021, Pages 6201–6215. After publication of the paper, a typo in one of the equations was discovered. In equation (18), the exponent of ‘-1’ is missing. The correct form of the equation, which is taken from Rab et al. (2017), is therefore (Formula Presented). This correction does only concern the paper text, not our numerical results, hence, it does not change the results of the original paper. The calculation of the ionization rate as shown in fig. 5 in the paper was performed using the correct version of equation (18) in the original paper, i.e. equation (1) in this Erratum.

AB - The paper ‘MOVES – IV. Modelling the influence of stellar XUV-flux, cosmic rays, and stellar energetic particles on the atmospheric composition of the hot Jupiter HD 189733b’ was published in MNRAS, Volume 502, Issue 4, April 2021, Pages 6201–6215. After publication of the paper, a typo in one of the equations was discovered. In equation (18), the exponent of ‘-1’ is missing. The correct form of the equation, which is taken from Rab et al. (2017), is therefore (Formula Presented). This correction does only concern the paper text, not our numerical results, hence, it does not change the results of the original paper. The calculation of the ionization rate as shown in fig. 5 in the paper was performed using the correct version of equation (18) in the original paper, i.e. equation (1) in this Erratum.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85144708762&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85144708762&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/mnras/stab1875

DO - 10.1093/mnras/stab1875

M3 - Comment/debate

AN - SCOPUS:85144708762

SN - 0035-8711

VL - 506

SP - 1333

JO - Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society

JF - Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society

IS - 1

ER -