Erratum to: Higgs boson production cross-section measurements and their EFT interpretation in the 4 ℓ decay channel at s = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector (The European Physical Journal C, (2020), 80, 10, (957), 10.1140/epjc/s10052-020-8227-9)

ATLAS Collaboration

doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-021-09116-6

Erratum to: Higgs boson production cross-section measurements and their EFT interpretation in the 4 ℓ decay channel at s = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector (The European Physical Journal C, (2020), 80, 10, (957), 10.1140/epjc/s10052-020-8227-9)

ATLAS Collaboration

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate › peer-review

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

When quoting the final cross section result in the text of the paper (Eur. Phys. J. C 80 (2020) 957), the theory component of the uncertainty was incorrectly set to 0.04 pb while the correct value of 0.03 pb was given in Table 8 and in all other results reported in this paper.

Original language	English
Article number	398
Journal	European Physical Journal C
Volume	81
Issue number	5
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-021-09116-6
Publication status	Published - May 2021
Externally published	Yes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Engineering (miscellaneous)
Physics and Astronomy (miscellaneous)

Access to Document

10.1140/epjc/s10052-021-09116-6

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Erratum to: Higgs boson production cross-section measurements and their EFT interpretation in the 4 ℓ decay channel at s = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector (The European Physical Journal C, (2020), 80, 10, (957), 10.1140/epjc/s10052-020-8227-9)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this

ATLAS Collaboration (2021). Erratum to: Higgs boson production cross-section measurements and their EFT interpretation in the 4 ℓ decay channel at s = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector (The European Physical Journal C, (2020), 80, 10, (957), 10.1140/epjc/s10052-020-8227-9). European Physical Journal C, 81(5), Article 398. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-021-09116-6

Erratum to: Higgs boson production cross-section measurements and their EFT interpretation in the 4 ℓ decay channel at s = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector (The European Physical Journal C, (2020), 80, 10, (957), 10.1140/epjc/s10052-020-8227-9). / ATLAS Collaboration.
In: European Physical Journal C, Vol. 81, No. 5, 398, 05.2021.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate › peer-review

ATLAS Collaboration 2021, 'Erratum to: Higgs boson production cross-section measurements and their EFT interpretation in the 4 ℓ decay channel at s = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector (The European Physical Journal C, (2020), 80, 10, (957), 10.1140/epjc/s10052-020-8227-9)', European Physical Journal C, vol. 81, no. 5, 398. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-021-09116-6

@article{e842db73425c4b7fa6ac7fbe3222769d,

title = "Erratum to: Higgs boson production cross-section measurements and their EFT interpretation in the 4 ℓ decay channel at s = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector (The European Physical Journal C, (2020), 80, 10, (957), 10.1140/epjc/s10052-020-8227-9)",

abstract = "When quoting the final cross section result in the text of the paper (Eur. Phys. J. C 80 (2020) 957), the theory component of the uncertainty was incorrectly set to 0.04 pb while the correct value of 0.03 pb was given in Table 8 and in all other results reported in this paper.",

author = "\{ATLAS Collaboration\} and G. Aad and B. Abbott and Abbott, \{D. C.\} and Abud, \{A. Abed\} and K. Abeling and Abhayasinghe, \{D. K.\} and Abidi, \{S. H.\} and Abouzeid, \{O. S.\} and Abraham, \{N. L.\} and H. Abramowicz and H. Abreu and Y. Abulaiti and Acharya, \{B. S.\} and B. Achkar and L. Adam and Bourdarios, \{C. Adam\} and L. Adamczyk and L. Adamek and J. Adelman and M. Adersberger and A. Adiguzel and S. Adorni and T. Adye and Affolder, \{A. A.\} and Y. Afik and C. Agapopoulou and Agaras, \{M. N.\} and A. Aggarwal and C. Agheorghiesei and Aguilar-Saavedra, \{J. A.\} and A. Ahmad and F. Ahmadov and Ahmed, \{W. S.\} and X. Ai and G. Aielli and S. Akatsuka and {\AA}kesson, \{T. P.A.\} and E. Akilli and Akimov, \{A. V.\} and Khoury, \{K. Al\} and Alberghi, \{G. L.\} and J. Albert and Verzini, \{M. J.Alconada\} and S. Alderweireldt and M. Aleksa and Aleksandrov, \{I. N.\} and C. Alexa and T. Alexopoulos and A. Alfonsi and M. Belfkir",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2021, CERN for the benefit of the ATLAS collaboration.",

year = "2021",

month = may,

doi = "10.1140/epjc/s10052-021-09116-6",

language = "English",

volume = "81",

journal = "European Physical Journal C",

issn = "1434-6044",

publisher = "Springer Nature",

number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Erratum to

T2 - Higgs boson production cross-section measurements and their EFT interpretation in the 4 ℓ decay channel at s = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector (The European Physical Journal C, (2020), 80, 10, (957), 10.1140/epjc/s10052-020-8227-9)

AU - ATLAS Collaboration

AU - Aad, G.

AU - Abbott, B.

AU - Abbott, D. C.

AU - Abud, A. Abed

AU - Abeling, K.

AU - Abhayasinghe, D. K.

AU - Abidi, S. H.

AU - Abouzeid, O. S.

AU - Abraham, N. L.

AU - Abramowicz, H.

AU - Abreu, H.

AU - Abulaiti, Y.

AU - Acharya, B. S.

AU - Achkar, B.

AU - Adam, L.

AU - Bourdarios, C. Adam

AU - Adamczyk, L.

AU - Adamek, L.

AU - Adelman, J.

AU - Adersberger, M.

AU - Adiguzel, A.

AU - Adorni, S.

AU - Adye, T.

AU - Affolder, A. A.

AU - Afik, Y.

AU - Agapopoulou, C.

AU - Agaras, M. N.

AU - Aggarwal, A.

AU - Agheorghiesei, C.

AU - Aguilar-Saavedra, J. A.

AU - Ahmad, A.

AU - Ahmadov, F.

AU - Ahmed, W. S.

AU - Ai, X.

AU - Aielli, G.

AU - Akatsuka, S.

AU - Åkesson, T. P.A.

AU - Akilli, E.

AU - Akimov, A. V.

AU - Khoury, K. Al

AU - Alberghi, G. L.

AU - Albert, J.

AU - Verzini, M. J.Alconada

AU - Alderweireldt, S.

AU - Aleksa, M.

AU - Aleksandrov, I. N.

AU - Alexa, C.

AU - Alexopoulos, T.

AU - Alfonsi, A.

AU - Belfkir, M.

PY - 2021/5

Y1 - 2021/5

N2 - When quoting the final cross section result in the text of the paper (Eur. Phys. J. C 80 (2020) 957), the theory component of the uncertainty was incorrectly set to 0.04 pb while the correct value of 0.03 pb was given in Table 8 and in all other results reported in this paper.

AB - When quoting the final cross section result in the text of the paper (Eur. Phys. J. C 80 (2020) 957), the theory component of the uncertainty was incorrectly set to 0.04 pb while the correct value of 0.03 pb was given in Table 8 and in all other results reported in this paper.

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85105876847

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85105876847#tab=citedBy

U2 - 10.1140/epjc/s10052-021-09116-6

DO - 10.1140/epjc/s10052-021-09116-6

M3 - Comment/debate

AN - SCOPUS:85105876847

SN - 1434-6044

VL - 81

JO - European Physical Journal C

JF - European Physical Journal C

IS - 5

M1 - 398

ER -