Evaluation of the automated leukocyte differential count in emergency department patients

Seraphim Rimarenko, Antonio Castella, Marc R. Salzberg, Calvin L. Strand

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study compares the results of the leukocyte three-part differential count as determined by the Coulter S-Plus IV in 104 consecutive patient samples from the emergency department with results obtained by conventional visual differential. A high rate (40%) of instrument rejection was found, reflecting the high prevalence of disease and hematologic abnormalities in the patient population. No clinically significant abnormality went undetected, demonstrating that the automatedleukocyte three-part differential is effective as a screening test in the emergency department patient population.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)187-189
Number of pages3
JournalAmerican Journal of Emergency Medicine
Volume5
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 1987
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Differential leukocyte count
  • leukocyte three-part differential

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Emergency Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Evaluation of the automated leukocyte differential count in emergency department patients'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this