Abstract
This study compares the results of the leukocyte three-part differential count as determined by the Coulter S-Plus IV in 104 consecutive patient samples from the emergency department with results obtained by conventional visual differential. A high rate (40%) of instrument rejection was found, reflecting the high prevalence of disease and hematologic abnormalities in the patient population. No clinically significant abnormality went undetected, demonstrating that the automatedleukocyte three-part differential is effective as a screening test in the emergency department patient population.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 187-189 |
| Number of pages | 3 |
| Journal | American Journal of Emergency Medicine |
| Volume | 5 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - May 1987 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Differential leukocyte count
- leukocyte three-part differential
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Emergency Medicine
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Evaluation of the automated leukocyte differential count in emergency department patients'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS