TY - JOUR
T1 - External validation and clinical usefulness of three commonly used cardiovascular risk prediction scores in an Emirati population
T2 - A retrospective longitudinal cohort study
AU - Al-Shamsi, Saif
AU - Govender, Romona Devi
AU - King, Jeffrey
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 BMJ Publishing Group. All rights reserved.
PY - 2020/10/28
Y1 - 2020/10/28
N2 - Objectives Cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk prediction models are useful tools for identifying those at high risk of cardiovascular events in a population. No studies have evaluated the performance of such risk models in an Arab population. Therefore, in this study, the accuracy and clinical usefulness of two commonly used Framingham-based risk models and the 2013 Pooled Cohort Risk Equation (PCE) were assessed in a United Arab Emirates (UAE) national population. Design A 10-year retrospective cohort study. Setting Outpatient clinics at a tertiary care hospital, Al-Ain, UAE. Participants The study cohort included 1041 UAE nationals aged 30-79 who had no history of CVD at baseline. Patients were followed until 31 December 2019. Eligible patients were grouped into the PCE and the Framingham validation cohorts. Exposure The 10-year predicted risk for CVD for each patient was calculated using the 2008 Framingham risk model, the 2008 office-based Framingham risk model, and the 2013 PCE model. Primary outcome measure The discrimination, calibration and clinical usefulness of the three models for predicting 10-year cardiovascular risk were assessed. Results In women, the 2013 PCE model showed marginally better discrimination (C-statistic: 0.77) than the 2008 Framingham models (C-statistic: 0.74-0.75), whereas all three models showed moderate discrimination in men (C-statistic: 0.69 €'0.70). All three models overestimated CVD risk in both men and women, with higher levels of predicted risk. The 2008 Framingham risk model (high-risk threshold of 20%) classified only 46% of women who subsequently developed incident CVD within 10 years as high risk. The 2013 PCE risk model (high-risk threshold of 7.5%) classified 74% of men who did not develop a cardiovascular event as high risk. Conclusions None of the three models is accurate for predicting cardiovascular risk in UAE nationals. The performance of the models could potentially be improved by recalibration.
AB - Objectives Cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk prediction models are useful tools for identifying those at high risk of cardiovascular events in a population. No studies have evaluated the performance of such risk models in an Arab population. Therefore, in this study, the accuracy and clinical usefulness of two commonly used Framingham-based risk models and the 2013 Pooled Cohort Risk Equation (PCE) were assessed in a United Arab Emirates (UAE) national population. Design A 10-year retrospective cohort study. Setting Outpatient clinics at a tertiary care hospital, Al-Ain, UAE. Participants The study cohort included 1041 UAE nationals aged 30-79 who had no history of CVD at baseline. Patients were followed until 31 December 2019. Eligible patients were grouped into the PCE and the Framingham validation cohorts. Exposure The 10-year predicted risk for CVD for each patient was calculated using the 2008 Framingham risk model, the 2008 office-based Framingham risk model, and the 2013 PCE model. Primary outcome measure The discrimination, calibration and clinical usefulness of the three models for predicting 10-year cardiovascular risk were assessed. Results In women, the 2013 PCE model showed marginally better discrimination (C-statistic: 0.77) than the 2008 Framingham models (C-statistic: 0.74-0.75), whereas all three models showed moderate discrimination in men (C-statistic: 0.69 €'0.70). All three models overestimated CVD risk in both men and women, with higher levels of predicted risk. The 2008 Framingham risk model (high-risk threshold of 20%) classified only 46% of women who subsequently developed incident CVD within 10 years as high risk. The 2013 PCE risk model (high-risk threshold of 7.5%) classified 74% of men who did not develop a cardiovascular event as high risk. Conclusions None of the three models is accurate for predicting cardiovascular risk in UAE nationals. The performance of the models could potentially be improved by recalibration.
KW - cardiovascular disease
KW - framingham
KW - pooled cohort equation
KW - risk prediction
KW - united arab emirates
KW - validation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85094841072&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85094841072&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040680
DO - 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040680
M3 - Article
C2 - 33115904
AN - SCOPUS:85094841072
SN - 2044-6055
VL - 10
JO - BMJ Open
JF - BMJ Open
IS - 10
M1 - e040680
ER -