TY - JOUR
T1 - Gestational diabetes in a tertiary care hospital
T2 - Implications of applying the IADPSG criteria
AU - Agarwal, Mukesh M.
AU - Dhatt, Gurdeep S.
AU - Othman, Yusra
PY - 2012/8
Y1 - 2012/8
N2 - Background: The American Diabetes Association has endorsed the International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Groups (IADPSG) recommendation that every pregnant woman should undergo the 75 g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) to screen for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). Purpose: To find the cost and workload implications of switching from the current two-step screening of GDM to the one-step IADPSG approach. Methods: The cost (US $) and laboratory workload units (WLU) were calculated for three possible strategies: (1) 50 g glucose screen, if positive, followed by the 100 g OGTT; (2) universal 75 g OGTT; and (3) screening with the initial fasting plasma glucose of the OGTT. Results: For the 1,101 pregnant women screened in 1 year, the cost of the three strategies was $ 31,985, $ 55,250 and $ 35,875, respectively; the laboratory burden was 28,975 WLU, 18,662 WLU and 12,215 WLU, respectively. Conclusions: Switching to the one-step, strategy 2 (IADPSG) would increase the cost by 42 % but decrease the laboratory workload by 36 % compared to the two-step, strategy 1. However, an initial screen by the fasting plasma glucose of the OGTT is the ideal strategy, both in terms of cost and laboratory workload.
AB - Background: The American Diabetes Association has endorsed the International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Groups (IADPSG) recommendation that every pregnant woman should undergo the 75 g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) to screen for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). Purpose: To find the cost and workload implications of switching from the current two-step screening of GDM to the one-step IADPSG approach. Methods: The cost (US $) and laboratory workload units (WLU) were calculated for three possible strategies: (1) 50 g glucose screen, if positive, followed by the 100 g OGTT; (2) universal 75 g OGTT; and (3) screening with the initial fasting plasma glucose of the OGTT. Results: For the 1,101 pregnant women screened in 1 year, the cost of the three strategies was $ 31,985, $ 55,250 and $ 35,875, respectively; the laboratory burden was 28,975 WLU, 18,662 WLU and 12,215 WLU, respectively. Conclusions: Switching to the one-step, strategy 2 (IADPSG) would increase the cost by 42 % but decrease the laboratory workload by 36 % compared to the two-step, strategy 1. However, an initial screen by the fasting plasma glucose of the OGTT is the ideal strategy, both in terms of cost and laboratory workload.
KW - Cost
KW - Gestational diabetes
KW - IADPSG
KW - Screening
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84864436578&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84864436578&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00404-012-2324-4
DO - 10.1007/s00404-012-2324-4
M3 - Article
C2 - 22484479
AN - SCOPUS:84864436578
SN - 0932-0067
VL - 286
SP - 373
EP - 378
JO - Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics
JF - Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics
IS - 2
ER -