TY - JOUR
T1 - Governmentality and counter-conduct
T2 - A field study of accounting amidst concurrent and competing rationales and programmes
AU - Ahrens, Thomas
AU - Ferry, Laurence
AU - Khalifa, Rihab
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2020/9
Y1 - 2020/9
N2 - This paper contributes to the diverse and growing stream of accounting research on Foucault's notion of counter-conduct, which is broadly concerned with the uses of accounting in the development of alternative ways of governing. Its key problematic lies in the roles that accounting can play in the intertwining of particular practices of governing, for instance, by underpinning practices that facilitate political campaigning, making specific policy choices, and creating new administrative arrangements. We illustrate our argument with some of the ways in which Newcastle City Council (NCC) used accounting to manoeuvre between the programmes of localism, centralism, devolution, austerity, and marketisation to develop novel forms of counter-conduct in response to austerity funding cuts. We show how accounting was used to underpin a multi-facetted counter-conduct that sought to profile itself locally and nationally against austerity as a highly visible and controversial programme of government. However, accounting also served to undermine NCC's own counter-conduct, for example, through its engagement with longer established programmes, such as marketisation, and by rationalising the council's administrative responses of austerity cuts.
AB - This paper contributes to the diverse and growing stream of accounting research on Foucault's notion of counter-conduct, which is broadly concerned with the uses of accounting in the development of alternative ways of governing. Its key problematic lies in the roles that accounting can play in the intertwining of particular practices of governing, for instance, by underpinning practices that facilitate political campaigning, making specific policy choices, and creating new administrative arrangements. We illustrate our argument with some of the ways in which Newcastle City Council (NCC) used accounting to manoeuvre between the programmes of localism, centralism, devolution, austerity, and marketisation to develop novel forms of counter-conduct in response to austerity funding cuts. We show how accounting was used to underpin a multi-facetted counter-conduct that sought to profile itself locally and nationally against austerity as a highly visible and controversial programme of government. However, accounting also served to undermine NCC's own counter-conduct, for example, through its engagement with longer established programmes, such as marketisation, and by rationalising the council's administrative responses of austerity cuts.
KW - Accounting
KW - Austerity
KW - Counter-conduct
KW - Devolution
KW - Governmentality
KW - Local government
KW - Localism
KW - Public sector budgeting
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85079119612&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85079119612&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.mar.2020.100686
DO - 10.1016/j.mar.2020.100686
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85079119612
SN - 1044-5005
VL - 48
JO - Management Accounting Research
JF - Management Accounting Research
M1 - 100686
ER -