TY - JOUR
T1 - Grammar resources for modelling dialogue dynamically
AU - Gargett, Andrew
AU - Gregoromichelaki, Eleni
AU - Kempson, Ruth
AU - Purver, Matthew
AU - Sato, Yo
N1 - Funding Information:
Acknowledgments We are grateful for ongoing feedback to Ronnie Cann, Patrick Healey, Greg James Mills, Chris Howes, Wilfried Meyer-Viol, Graham White. For suggestions and comments to: Robin Cooper, Arash Eshghi, Jonathan Ginzburg, Staffan Larsson, Raquel Fernández and an anonymous reviewer. Mistakes however have to be seen as our own. This work was supported by grants ESRC RES-062-23-0962 and Leverhulme F07 04OU, and reflects ongoing work.
PY - 2009/12
Y1 - 2009/12
N2 - This paper argues that by analysing language as a mechanism for growth of information (Cann et al. in The Dynamics of Language, Elsevier, Oxford, 2005; Kempson et al. in Dynamic Syntax, Blackwell, Oxford, 2001), not only does a unitary basis for ellipsis become possible, otherwise thought to be irredeemably heterogeneous, but also a whole range of sub-types of ellipsis, otherwise thought to be unique to dialogue, emerge as natural consequences of use of language in context. Dialogue fragment types modelled include reformulations, clarification requests, extensions, and acknowledgements. Buttressing this analysis, we show how incremental use of fragments serves to progressively narrow down the otherwise mushrooming interpretational alternatives in language use, and hence is central to fluent conversational interaction. We conclude that, by its ability to reflect dialogue dynamics as a core phenomenon of language use, a grammar with inbuilt parsing dynamics opens up the potential for analysing language as a mechanism for communicative interaction.
AB - This paper argues that by analysing language as a mechanism for growth of information (Cann et al. in The Dynamics of Language, Elsevier, Oxford, 2005; Kempson et al. in Dynamic Syntax, Blackwell, Oxford, 2001), not only does a unitary basis for ellipsis become possible, otherwise thought to be irredeemably heterogeneous, but also a whole range of sub-types of ellipsis, otherwise thought to be unique to dialogue, emerge as natural consequences of use of language in context. Dialogue fragment types modelled include reformulations, clarification requests, extensions, and acknowledgements. Buttressing this analysis, we show how incremental use of fragments serves to progressively narrow down the otherwise mushrooming interpretational alternatives in language use, and hence is central to fluent conversational interaction. We conclude that, by its ability to reflect dialogue dynamics as a core phenomenon of language use, a grammar with inbuilt parsing dynamics opens up the potential for analysing language as a mechanism for communicative interaction.
KW - Context
KW - Dialogue modelling
KW - Ellipsis
KW - Incrementality
KW - Natural language processing
KW - Pragmatics
KW - Semantics
KW - Syntax
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=72249121620&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=72249121620&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s11571-009-9088-y
DO - 10.1007/s11571-009-9088-y
M3 - Article
C2 - 19731085
AN - SCOPUS:72249121620
SN - 1871-4080
VL - 3
SP - 347
EP - 363
JO - Cognitive Neurodynamics
JF - Cognitive Neurodynamics
IS - 4
ER -