TY - GEN
T1 - Handling Missing Data in Limited-View Photoacoustic Tomography Using Compressive Sensing Algorithm-Based Deep Learning
AU - John, Mary
AU - Barhumi, Imad
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 IEEE.
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - In photoacoustic tomography, missing sensor data poses a significant challenge for accurate image reconstruction. This study aims to evaluate various imputation methods to address different missing data scenarios, including random missing data, communication loss, and environmental interference. We applied mean imputation, median imputation, k-nearest neighbors (KNN), and multivariate imputation by chained equations (MICE) to these scenarios and assessed their performance using metrics such as MS-SSIM, SSIM, PSNR, R-squared, NMSE, and Entropy. Our results demonstrate that the presence of missing data significantly degrades image quality, with MICE consistently providing the best reconstruction performance across all scenarios. In random missing data cases, MICE achieved the highest SSIM and PSNR values, closely approximating the no missing data scenario. Similar trends were observed in communication loss and environmental interference cases, where MICE outperformed other imputation methods, followed by mean and median imputation, with KNN generally showing the lowest performance. These findings suggest that MICE is a robust method for handling missing data in PAT, enhancing image reconstruction quality.
AB - In photoacoustic tomography, missing sensor data poses a significant challenge for accurate image reconstruction. This study aims to evaluate various imputation methods to address different missing data scenarios, including random missing data, communication loss, and environmental interference. We applied mean imputation, median imputation, k-nearest neighbors (KNN), and multivariate imputation by chained equations (MICE) to these scenarios and assessed their performance using metrics such as MS-SSIM, SSIM, PSNR, R-squared, NMSE, and Entropy. Our results demonstrate that the presence of missing data significantly degrades image quality, with MICE consistently providing the best reconstruction performance across all scenarios. In random missing data cases, MICE achieved the highest SSIM and PSNR values, closely approximating the no missing data scenario. Similar trends were observed in communication loss and environmental interference cases, where MICE outperformed other imputation methods, followed by mean and median imputation, with KNN generally showing the lowest performance. These findings suggest that MICE is a robust method for handling missing data in PAT, enhancing image reconstruction quality.
KW - Compressive Sensing
KW - Deep Learning
KW - Image Reconstruction
KW - Missing Data
KW - Multivariate Imputation by Chained Equations
KW - Photoacoustic Tomography
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85218187290&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85218187290&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1109/APSIPAASC63619.2025.10848678
DO - 10.1109/APSIPAASC63619.2025.10848678
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:85218187290
T3 - APSIPA ASC 2024 - Asia Pacific Signal and Information Processing Association Annual Summit and Conference 2024
BT - APSIPA ASC 2024 - Asia Pacific Signal and Information Processing Association Annual Summit and Conference 2024
PB - Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
T2 - 2024 Asia Pacific Signal and Information Processing Association Annual Summit and Conference, APSIPA ASC 2024
Y2 - 3 December 2024 through 6 December 2024
ER -