Abstract
This article demonstrates how different assumptions about occupants during building performance simulation (BPS)-aided design can lead to different design decisions. This is accomplished by evaluating the sensitivity of several building design parameters against the occupant-related assumptions made by the energy modeler, architect, and mechanical engineer. The model described in this article is that of a real office building in Toronto, Canada. By altering occupant-related assumptions (such as the number of people in the building, the plug-in equipment power density [EPD], and the lighting power density [LPD]), this study shows the sensitivity of the ranking of design alternatives as well as energy-savings potential fluctuations when different assumptions are applied.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Journal | ASHRAE Journal |
| Volume | 62 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| Publication status | Published - Jan 2020 |
| Externally published | Yes |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Building and Construction
- Mechanical Engineering
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'How assumptions about occupants can misinform building design'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS