How double-blind peer review works and what it takes to be a good referee

Eloísa Martín

doi:10.1177/0011392116656711

How double-blind peer review works and what it takes to be a good referee

Eloísa Martín

Research output: Contribution to journal › Editorial › peer-review

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This editorial describes the double-blind peer review process used by academic journals in the social sciences with a particular focus on the process at Current Sociology. Guidance is also provided to help referees write an appropriate and constructive review. Finally, it addresses some of the major challenges of the peer review process at the practical, epistemic and political level.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	691-698
Number of pages	8
Journal	Current Sociology
Volume	64
Issue number	5
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392116656711
Publication status	Published - Sept 1 2016
Externally published	Yes

Keywords

Academic publication
double-blind peer review
international publication
productivism
referee
the gift

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Sociology and Political Science

Access to Document

10.1177/0011392116656711

Cite this

@article{16fcf1bda34d4916959c06f607d7a559,

title = "How double-blind peer review works and what it takes to be a good referee",

abstract = "This editorial describes the double-blind peer review process used by academic journals in the social sciences with a particular focus on the process at Current Sociology. Guidance is also provided to help referees write an appropriate and constructive review. Finally, it addresses some of the major challenges of the peer review process at the practical, epistemic and political level.",

keywords = "Academic publication, double-blind peer review, international publication, productivism, referee, the gift",

author = "Elo{\'i}sa Mart{\'i}n",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2016, {\textcopyright} The Author(s) 2016.",

year = "2016",

month = sep,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1177/0011392116656711",

language = "English",

volume = "64",

pages = "691--698",

journal = "Current Sociology",

issn = "0011-3921",

publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",

number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - How double-blind peer review works and what it takes to be a good referee

AU - Martín, Eloísa

PY - 2016/9/1

Y1 - 2016/9/1

N2 - This editorial describes the double-blind peer review process used by academic journals in the social sciences with a particular focus on the process at Current Sociology. Guidance is also provided to help referees write an appropriate and constructive review. Finally, it addresses some of the major challenges of the peer review process at the practical, epistemic and political level.

AB - This editorial describes the double-blind peer review process used by academic journals in the social sciences with a particular focus on the process at Current Sociology. Guidance is also provided to help referees write an appropriate and constructive review. Finally, it addresses some of the major challenges of the peer review process at the practical, epistemic and political level.

KW - Academic publication

KW - double-blind peer review

KW - international publication

KW - productivism

KW - referee

KW - the gift

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84982224072&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84982224072&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0011392116656711

DO - 10.1177/0011392116656711

M3 - Editorial

AN - SCOPUS:84982224072

SN - 0011-3921

VL - 64

SP - 691

EP - 698

JO - Current Sociology

JF - Current Sociology

IS - 5

ER -

How double-blind peer review works and what it takes to be a good referee

Abstract

Keywords

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this