TY - JOUR
T1 - Hybrid retrofitting for upgrading the seismic performance of adjacent bridges vulnerable to different damage modes including pounding
AU - Hasina, Jumana
AU - Mwafy, Aman
AU - Issa, Anas
AU - Alam, M. Shahria
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 The Authors
PY - 2025/3/15
Y1 - 2025/3/15
N2 - Earthquake-induced damage, such as pounding, has emphasized the vulnerability of existing bridges, underscoring the essential requirement for retrofitting. This study thus aims to select hybrid retrofit strategies for upgrading the seismic performance of reinforced concrete substandard bridges vulnerable to various damage modes to ensure the safety and serviceability of existing bridges. The study proposes implementing steel dampers to reduce bearing displacement (BD), innovative rubber bumpers in separation gaps to alleviate structural pounding between adjacent bridges, and ultra-high-performance concrete (UHPC) jackets and self-centering buckling restrained braces (SC-BRB) to mitigate curvature ductility (CD) demands of bridge substructure. The idealization of the adopted mitigation measures is verified by comparing their fiber-based numerical models with the hysteretic behavior observed from previous experimental studies. The numerically validated retrofit strategies are then applied to existing benchmark adjacent bridges commonly prevailing in a medium seismicity study area. The adjacent bridges’ dynamic characteristics and lateral capacity are initially investigated to evaluate the retrofit options by monitoring various local damage indices. Fragility analyses are conducted under different seismic scenarios to assess the relative performance of the adopted retrofit schemes and to evaluate the likelihood of exceeding the seismic capacity of the retrofitted bridge structure. Although the probabilistic assessment study indicated that the UHPC and SC-BRB retrofit options enhanced the bridges’ lateral capacity by a comparable ratio of 53 %, the adopted seismic performance-cost indicator of SC-BRB retrofit measure exceeded that of the UHPC alternative by 39 %-79 %, confirming its preference among the considered two alternatives. The steel dampers effectively reduce BD demands, whereas rubber bumpers adequately decrease pounding force demands. This study thus offers insights into the effects of integrating the adopted seismic risk mitigation techniques into an effective and economical hybrid retrofit measure to mitigate the vulnerability of substandard adjacent bridges, thereby ensuring their functionality post-earthquake.
AB - Earthquake-induced damage, such as pounding, has emphasized the vulnerability of existing bridges, underscoring the essential requirement for retrofitting. This study thus aims to select hybrid retrofit strategies for upgrading the seismic performance of reinforced concrete substandard bridges vulnerable to various damage modes to ensure the safety and serviceability of existing bridges. The study proposes implementing steel dampers to reduce bearing displacement (BD), innovative rubber bumpers in separation gaps to alleviate structural pounding between adjacent bridges, and ultra-high-performance concrete (UHPC) jackets and self-centering buckling restrained braces (SC-BRB) to mitigate curvature ductility (CD) demands of bridge substructure. The idealization of the adopted mitigation measures is verified by comparing their fiber-based numerical models with the hysteretic behavior observed from previous experimental studies. The numerically validated retrofit strategies are then applied to existing benchmark adjacent bridges commonly prevailing in a medium seismicity study area. The adjacent bridges’ dynamic characteristics and lateral capacity are initially investigated to evaluate the retrofit options by monitoring various local damage indices. Fragility analyses are conducted under different seismic scenarios to assess the relative performance of the adopted retrofit schemes and to evaluate the likelihood of exceeding the seismic capacity of the retrofitted bridge structure. Although the probabilistic assessment study indicated that the UHPC and SC-BRB retrofit options enhanced the bridges’ lateral capacity by a comparable ratio of 53 %, the adopted seismic performance-cost indicator of SC-BRB retrofit measure exceeded that of the UHPC alternative by 39 %-79 %, confirming its preference among the considered two alternatives. The steel dampers effectively reduce BD demands, whereas rubber bumpers adequately decrease pounding force demands. This study thus offers insights into the effects of integrating the adopted seismic risk mitigation techniques into an effective and economical hybrid retrofit measure to mitigate the vulnerability of substandard adjacent bridges, thereby ensuring their functionality post-earthquake.
KW - Adjacent bridges
KW - Pounding
KW - Probabilistic assessment
KW - SC-BRB
KW - Seismic risk mitigation
KW - Steel dampers
KW - UHPC jacket
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85215095211&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85215095211&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.engstruct.2025.119686
DO - 10.1016/j.engstruct.2025.119686
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85215095211
SN - 0141-0296
VL - 327
JO - Engineering Structures
JF - Engineering Structures
M1 - 119686
ER -