TY - JOUR
T1 - INNOVATIONS OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN LIGHT OF THE APPLICABLE COPYRIGHT LAW
T2 - REALISTIC SOLUTIONS AND FUTURE PROSPECTS. A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF UAE, EGYPTIAN, AND FRENCH LAWS
AU - Fayed, Abed
AU - Zakaria, Aliaa
AU - Abouahmed, Alaa
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 Abed Fayed, Aliaa Zakaria and Alaa Abouahmed.
PY - 2025
Y1 - 2025
N2 - Background: This paper focuses on the works and innovations accomplished by artificial intelligence (AI) and how current laws and regulations address these innovations within the framework of copyright law. It examines the challenges faced by legal systems in the UAE, Egypt, and France concerning the copyrights of intellectual works produced through AI systems, such as ChatGPT. The study highlights the issue of defining "author" in copyright law, particularly given that AI lacks the personal characteristics associated with human creators. Methods: The paper employs a comparative legal analysis, focusing on the legal frameworks of the UAE, Egypt, and France. It examines how each jurisdiction currently addresses AI-generated intellectual property and whether existing laws adequately account for AI's role in creative processes. The study also explores the possibility of granting AI systems "legal capacity" and the need for a specific Code of Ethics to regulate AI use in a manner consistent with human and ethical values.Results and Conclusions: The study concludes an urgent need to review and amend existing laws to create a legal framework that effectively addresses copyrights related to AI-generated innovations. This framework should balance the promotion of innovation with the protection of legal rights, ensuring that AI developments are ethically regulated and legally recognised.
AB - Background: This paper focuses on the works and innovations accomplished by artificial intelligence (AI) and how current laws and regulations address these innovations within the framework of copyright law. It examines the challenges faced by legal systems in the UAE, Egypt, and France concerning the copyrights of intellectual works produced through AI systems, such as ChatGPT. The study highlights the issue of defining "author" in copyright law, particularly given that AI lacks the personal characteristics associated with human creators. Methods: The paper employs a comparative legal analysis, focusing on the legal frameworks of the UAE, Egypt, and France. It examines how each jurisdiction currently addresses AI-generated intellectual property and whether existing laws adequately account for AI's role in creative processes. The study also explores the possibility of granting AI systems "legal capacity" and the need for a specific Code of Ethics to regulate AI use in a manner consistent with human and ethical values.Results and Conclusions: The study concludes an urgent need to review and amend existing laws to create a legal framework that effectively addresses copyrights related to AI-generated innovations. This framework should balance the promotion of innovation with the protection of legal rights, ensuring that AI developments are ethically regulated and legally recognised.
KW - Chat-GPT and AI models
KW - copyright challenges in AI innovation
KW - copyright law and AI
KW - French copyright law
KW - intellectual property rights for AI
KW - UAE copyright law
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=105001954736&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=105001954736&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.33327/AJEE-18-8.1-a000116
DO - 10.33327/AJEE-18-8.1-a000116
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:105001954736
SN - 2663-0575
VL - 8
SP - 241
EP - 263
JO - Access to Justice in Eastern Europe
JF - Access to Justice in Eastern Europe
IS - 1
ER -