Abstract
This paper models inter-jurisdiction competition for foreign direct investment and optimal government policy intervention to protect the national interest. The inter-jurisdiction competition for a multinational has the potential of favouring the multinational and of becoming detrimental for the host country. The central government wants to limit such competition but it cannot tax-discriminate between different types of multinationals. We find that the central government would use tax policy to create asymmetries even when the underlying structure is symmetrical. This offers a novel explanation for the creation of 'Special Economic Zones' in many countries, which are well known to be aimed at the attraction of foreign direct investment.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 688-702 |
| Number of pages | 15 |
| Journal | Regional Science and Urban Economics |
| Volume | 37 |
| Issue number | 6 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Nov 2007 |
| Externally published | Yes |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 10 Reduced Inequalities
Keywords
- Bargaining
- Competition
- Foreign direct investment (FDI)
- Regional
- Subsidy
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Economics and Econometrics
- Urban Studies
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Inter-jurisdiction subsidy competition for a new production plant: What is the central government optimal policy?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS