Judgment analysis vs. Paired comparison as a statistical procedure for capturing policy models in readability prediction

Samuel R. Houston, Khalaf N. Al-Heeti, Abdullah H. Al-Harby

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Judgment Analysis (JAN) and JAN-paired comparison (JAN-PC) were compared as a statistical policy-capturing strategy for evaluating the readability of selected passages. Fifteen reading passages were selected from common textbooks used in the first six grades. Five reading experts rank ordered the passages, which were described on five linguistic variables. More consistent results for each judge and fewer policies were obtained with JAN-PC as compared with the JAN procedure.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)24-27
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of Experimental Education
Volume56
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1987
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Judgment analysis vs. Paired comparison as a statistical procedure for capturing policy models in readability prediction'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this