TY - JOUR
T1 - Length of survival of patients with cancer in hospice
T2 - A retrospective analysis of patients treated at a major cancer center versus other practice settings
AU - Younis, Tallal
AU - Milch, Robert
AU - Abul-Khoudoud, Nawal
AU - Lawrence, David
AU - Mirand, Amy
AU - Levine, Ellis G.
PY - 2007/4
Y1 - 2007/4
N2 - This is a retrospective study of the length of survival (LOS) in hospice of patients with cancer treated at a major cancer center compared to other treatment sites. Of 670 patients, the 185 (28%) treated at a major cancer center had unique characteristics, including higher median Palliative Performance Score (PPS) at the time of hospice enrollment (45 versus 40, p = 0.009), and longer median LOS in hospice (35 versus 21 days, p = 0.02: log rank test). Additional variables that predicted longer LOS were higher PPS, Medicare or Medicaid, self-referral, unmarried status, and non-executed advance directives. After adjusting survival for PPS with a Cox proportional hazard model, the hazard ratio for PPS remained statistically significant (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.95-0.97] while that for the treatment site was not (95% CI: 0.73-1.04]. The performance status, and not the treatment site, was the dominant predictor of the LOS of patients with cancer in hospice.
AB - This is a retrospective study of the length of survival (LOS) in hospice of patients with cancer treated at a major cancer center compared to other treatment sites. Of 670 patients, the 185 (28%) treated at a major cancer center had unique characteristics, including higher median Palliative Performance Score (PPS) at the time of hospice enrollment (45 versus 40, p = 0.009), and longer median LOS in hospice (35 versus 21 days, p = 0.02: log rank test). Additional variables that predicted longer LOS were higher PPS, Medicare or Medicaid, self-referral, unmarried status, and non-executed advance directives. After adjusting survival for PPS with a Cox proportional hazard model, the hazard ratio for PPS remained statistically significant (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.95-0.97] while that for the treatment site was not (95% CI: 0.73-1.04]. The performance status, and not the treatment site, was the dominant predictor of the LOS of patients with cancer in hospice.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34248398770&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34248398770&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1089/jpm.2006.0071
DO - 10.1089/jpm.2006.0071
M3 - Article
C2 - 17472510
AN - SCOPUS:34248398770
SN - 1096-6218
VL - 10
SP - 381
EP - 389
JO - Journal of Palliative Medicine
JF - Journal of Palliative Medicine
IS - 2
ER -