TY - GEN
T1 - Maximum Sensitivity Based Robust Latency Compensator for Frequency Regulation in Microgrid with SMES
AU - Kumar, Deepak
AU - Raja, G. Lloyds
AU - Alkhatib, Mohamed
AU - Muduli, Utkal Ranjan
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 IEEE.
PY - 2025
Y1 - 2025
N2 - The communication latency in power systems hinders load frequency control efficacy by introducing phase lag and jeopardising closed-loop stability. When the governor system fails to regulate frequency variations owing to its delayed reaction, active power sources with rapid responsiveness, such as superconducting magnetic energy storage (SMES), are very beneficial in improving system responsiveness. This study introduces a Smith predictor-based proportional integral derivative with filter (PIDF) controller architecture using the direct synthesis approach to boost robustness in the presence of significant communication delay. The only tuning parameter of the PIDF controller is intended to attain an acceptable balance between performance and robustness, taking into account maximum sensitivity considerations. Simulation studies confirm the superiority of the PIDF controller in case of multiple step load disturbance patterns, unequal perturbations, non-linearities (such as boiler dynamics and governor deadband), and SMES.
AB - The communication latency in power systems hinders load frequency control efficacy by introducing phase lag and jeopardising closed-loop stability. When the governor system fails to regulate frequency variations owing to its delayed reaction, active power sources with rapid responsiveness, such as superconducting magnetic energy storage (SMES), are very beneficial in improving system responsiveness. This study introduces a Smith predictor-based proportional integral derivative with filter (PIDF) controller architecture using the direct synthesis approach to boost robustness in the presence of significant communication delay. The only tuning parameter of the PIDF controller is intended to attain an acceptable balance between performance and robustness, taking into account maximum sensitivity considerations. Simulation studies confirm the superiority of the PIDF controller in case of multiple step load disturbance patterns, unequal perturbations, non-linearities (such as boiler dynamics and governor deadband), and SMES.
KW - Load frequency control
KW - Maximum sensitivity
KW - Microgrid
KW - Smith predictor
KW - Superconducting magnetic energy storage
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105011087621
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105011087621#tab=citedBy
U2 - 10.1109/IAS62731.2025.11061452
DO - 10.1109/IAS62731.2025.11061452
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:105011087621
T3 - Conference Record - IAS Annual Meeting (IEEE Industry Applications Society)
BT - 2025 IEEE Industry Applications Society Annual Meeting, IAS 2025
PB - Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
T2 - 2025 IEEE Industry Applications Society Annual Meeting, IAS 2025
Y2 - 15 June 2025 through 20 June 2025
ER -