TY - JOUR
T1 - Meningococcal disease in the Middle East
T2 - A report from the Global Meningococcal Initiative
AU - Al-Abri, Seif S.
AU - Abuhasan, Musallam Yunus
AU - Albayat, Soha Shawqi A.
AU - Bai, Xilian
AU - Bastaki, Hamad
AU - Borrow, Ray
AU - Caugant, Dominique A.
AU - Dbaibo, Ghassan
AU - Deghmane, Ala Eddine
AU - Dinleyici, Ener Cagri
AU - Ghuneim, Nedal
AU - Sheek-Hussein, Mohamud
AU - Lucidarme, Jay
AU - Leng, Sean
AU - Koliou, Maria G.
AU - Sáfadi, Marco A.P.
AU - Salman, Jameela Al
AU - Al-Sanouri, Tarek
AU - Smith, Vinny
AU - Taha, Muhamed Kheir
AU - Vázquez, Julio
AU - Wright, Claire
AU - Yezli, Saber
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - This review details recent findings from the Global Meningococcal Initiative's (GMI) recent meeting on the surveillance and control strategies for invasive meningococcal disease in the Middle East. The nature of case reporting and notification varies across the region, with many countries using bacterial meningitis as an IMD case definition in lieu of meningitis and septicaemia. This may overlook a significant burden associated with IMD leading to underreporting or misreporting of the disease. Based on these current definitions, IMD reported incidence remains low across the region, with historical outbreaks mainly occurring due to the Hajj and Umrah mass gatherings. The use of case confirmation techniques also varies in Middle Eastern countries. While typical microbiological techniques, such as culture and Gram staining, are widely used for characterisation, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing is utilised in a small number of countries. PCR testing may be inaccessible for several reasons including sample transportation, cost, or a lack of laboratory expertise. These barriers, not exclusive to PCR use, may impact surveillance systems more broadly. Another concern throughout the region is potentially widespread ciprofloxacin resistance since its use for chemoprophylaxis remains high in many countries.
AB - This review details recent findings from the Global Meningococcal Initiative's (GMI) recent meeting on the surveillance and control strategies for invasive meningococcal disease in the Middle East. The nature of case reporting and notification varies across the region, with many countries using bacterial meningitis as an IMD case definition in lieu of meningitis and septicaemia. This may overlook a significant burden associated with IMD leading to underreporting or misreporting of the disease. Based on these current definitions, IMD reported incidence remains low across the region, with historical outbreaks mainly occurring due to the Hajj and Umrah mass gatherings. The use of case confirmation techniques also varies in Middle Eastern countries. While typical microbiological techniques, such as culture and Gram staining, are widely used for characterisation, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing is utilised in a small number of countries. PCR testing may be inaccessible for several reasons including sample transportation, cost, or a lack of laboratory expertise. These barriers, not exclusive to PCR use, may impact surveillance systems more broadly. Another concern throughout the region is potentially widespread ciprofloxacin resistance since its use for chemoprophylaxis remains high in many countries.
KW - Meningococcal disease
KW - Middle East
KW - Serogroup
KW - Surveillance
KW - Vaccination
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85175316585&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85175316585&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jinf.2023.10.011
DO - 10.1016/j.jinf.2023.10.011
M3 - Review article
C2 - 37866792
AN - SCOPUS:85175316585
SN - 0163-4453
JO - Journal of Infection
JF - Journal of Infection
ER -