Modified null convention logic pipeline to detect soft errors in both null and data phases

F. K. Lodhi, O. Hasan, S. R. Hasan, F. Awwad

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Glitches due to soft errors can act as a severe deterrent to asynchronous circuit operations. To mitigate soft errors in quasi delay insensitive (QDI) asynchronous circuits, built-in soft error correction in NULL convention logic (NCL) has been introduced [9]. However, this technique cannot detect errors during the NULL phase of NCL pipeline, and also cannot avoid error propagation into the pipeline after its detection. This paper provides a modified approach to overcome these limitations with, on average, comparable power and latency costs. This work also analyzes the temperature variation effects on latency and power consumption of the proposed design. The modified NCL pipeline is implemented in IHP 90nm CMOS technology and analyzed under various operating temperatures. It is found that the proposed design survives well in the worst case operating temperatures and does not propagate soft errors.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publication2012 IEEE 55th International Midwest Symposium on Circuits and Systems, MWSCAS 2012
Pages402-405
Number of pages4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012
Event2012 IEEE 55th International Midwest Symposium on Circuits and Systems, MWSCAS 2012 - Boise, ID, United States
Duration: Aug 5 2012Aug 8 2012

Publication series

NameMidwest Symposium on Circuits and Systems
ISSN (Print)1548-3746

Other

Other2012 IEEE 55th International Midwest Symposium on Circuits and Systems, MWSCAS 2012
Country/TerritoryUnited States
CityBoise, ID
Period8/5/128/8/12

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Modified null convention logic pipeline to detect soft errors in both null and data phases'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this