TY - JOUR
T1 - Negativity in the Heart of Nature
T2 - A Study of Art of Vincent Van Gogh through Hegel, Nietzsche, and Heidegger
AU - Marren, Marina
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
PY - 2020
Y1 - 2020
N2 - The focus of this essay is the art of Vincent van Gogh and the way in which van Gogh’s understanding of nature informs his landscape painting. Van Gogh’s descriptions of the relationship between nature and his art betray certain humanist views that invest nature with anthropomorphic elements. Van Gogh seeks to subdue nature in order to uncover its essence and divulge its inner truth. I do not defend van Gogh on these points as it is not my position that there is some hidden truth that must be revealed about nature. I also do not hold that, at bottom, nature and human beings are one. In fact, I argue that these views, precisely, pave the way to the tragedy of van Gogh’s life, because they make him blind to the fact that, in his attempts at wresting truth from nature, he works to uproot himself. My interest in this paper lies along the lines of answering the question that van Gogh’s articulation of his artistic process allows us to ask. This question is: What is the role of aesthetic feeling in the artist’s ability to understand nature and make it intelligible to his audience? The correlate of this question is: How and at what cost does van Gogh’s landscape painting accomplish this transformation of aisthesis into art? In my analyses of van Gogh’s art, nature, and the relationship between feeling and intelligibility, I rely on Nietzsche’s, Heidegger’s, and Hegel’s articulations of these subjects.
AB - The focus of this essay is the art of Vincent van Gogh and the way in which van Gogh’s understanding of nature informs his landscape painting. Van Gogh’s descriptions of the relationship between nature and his art betray certain humanist views that invest nature with anthropomorphic elements. Van Gogh seeks to subdue nature in order to uncover its essence and divulge its inner truth. I do not defend van Gogh on these points as it is not my position that there is some hidden truth that must be revealed about nature. I also do not hold that, at bottom, nature and human beings are one. In fact, I argue that these views, precisely, pave the way to the tragedy of van Gogh’s life, because they make him blind to the fact that, in his attempts at wresting truth from nature, he works to uproot himself. My interest in this paper lies along the lines of answering the question that van Gogh’s articulation of his artistic process allows us to ask. This question is: What is the role of aesthetic feeling in the artist’s ability to understand nature and make it intelligible to his audience? The correlate of this question is: How and at what cost does van Gogh’s landscape painting accomplish this transformation of aisthesis into art? In my analyses of van Gogh’s art, nature, and the relationship between feeling and intelligibility, I rely on Nietzsche’s, Heidegger’s, and Hegel’s articulations of these subjects.
KW - Essence
KW - Paul Klee
KW - post-impressionism
KW - subjugation of nature
KW - tragedy
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85124513338&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85124513338&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/20539320.2020.1885173
DO - 10.1080/20539320.2020.1885173
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85124513338
SN - 2053-9320
VL - 7
SP - 139
EP - 157
JO - Journal of Aesthetics and Phenomenology
JF - Journal of Aesthetics and Phenomenology
IS - 2
ER -