TY - JOUR
T1 - Neurocognitive Predictors of Clinical Improvement in Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor-Treated Adolescents with Major Depressive Disorder
AU - Maalouf, Fadi
AU - Bakhti, Rinad
AU - Tamim, Hani
AU - Shehab, Safa
AU - Brent, David
N1 - Funding Information:
Dr. Fadi Maalouf receives grants support from the Medical Practice Plan–Faculty of Medicine at the American University of Beirut and is on the speaker Bureau of Eli Lilly and Company. Dr. David Brent receives research support from NIMH, royalties from Guilford Press, royalties from the electronic self-rated version of the C-SSRS from ERT, Inc., royalties from performing duties as an UptoDate Psychiatry Section Editor, and consulting fees from Healthwise. R.B., H.T., and S.S. have no conflict of interests.
Funding Information:
1Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon. 2Department of Internal Medicine, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon. 3Western Psychiatric Institute and Clinic, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. Funding: This investigation was supported by American University of Beirut—Medical Practice Plan and American Foundation of Suicide Prevention.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2018, Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.
PY - 2018/8
Y1 - 2018/8
N2 - Objectives: Numerous studies have suggested cognitive deficits as consistently associated with adolescent depression. No study to date, however, has assessed neurocognitive predictors of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) treatment response in adolescents with depression. This study examined neurocognitive tasks at baseline as predictors of clinical improvement with SSRI treatment (fluoxetine) at week 6 and 12 in an adolescent population. Methods: Adolescents with depression were recruited from a child and adolescent psychiatry outpatient clinic at a university medical center. Twenty-four adolescents (mean age 14.8 years) with Major Depressive Disorder completed tasks of the Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery, including visual memory, executive functioning, sustained attention, and impulsivity. Depression severity, measured by the Children's Depression Rating Scale-Revised (CDRS-R), was assessed at week 6 and 12 and clinical improvement was defined as percentage (%) change in CDRS-R from baseline. Results: Clinical improvement is noted at both week 6 (mean % change in CDRS-R [M] = 46.8, standard deviation [SD] = 51.9) and week 12 (M = 87.9, SD = 57.2). Results reveal that less difficulty in sustained attention (p = 0.02), lower impulsivity (p = 0.00), and better planning (p = 0.04) at baseline were predictors of greater clinical improvement at week 6. Lower impulsivity at baseline remained significantly predictive of clinical improvement at week 12 (p = 0.01). Conclusion: Neurocognitive assessments could potentially help identify a subset of depressed adolescents who may not respond to conventional SSRI treatment and who may be better candidates for alternative or augmentation treatments.
AB - Objectives: Numerous studies have suggested cognitive deficits as consistently associated with adolescent depression. No study to date, however, has assessed neurocognitive predictors of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) treatment response in adolescents with depression. This study examined neurocognitive tasks at baseline as predictors of clinical improvement with SSRI treatment (fluoxetine) at week 6 and 12 in an adolescent population. Methods: Adolescents with depression were recruited from a child and adolescent psychiatry outpatient clinic at a university medical center. Twenty-four adolescents (mean age 14.8 years) with Major Depressive Disorder completed tasks of the Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery, including visual memory, executive functioning, sustained attention, and impulsivity. Depression severity, measured by the Children's Depression Rating Scale-Revised (CDRS-R), was assessed at week 6 and 12 and clinical improvement was defined as percentage (%) change in CDRS-R from baseline. Results: Clinical improvement is noted at both week 6 (mean % change in CDRS-R [M] = 46.8, standard deviation [SD] = 51.9) and week 12 (M = 87.9, SD = 57.2). Results reveal that less difficulty in sustained attention (p = 0.02), lower impulsivity (p = 0.00), and better planning (p = 0.04) at baseline were predictors of greater clinical improvement at week 6. Lower impulsivity at baseline remained significantly predictive of clinical improvement at week 12 (p = 0.01). Conclusion: Neurocognitive assessments could potentially help identify a subset of depressed adolescents who may not respond to conventional SSRI treatment and who may be better candidates for alternative or augmentation treatments.
KW - Neurocognitive predictors
KW - adolescent depression
KW - impulsivity
KW - sustained attention
KW - treatment response
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85050274036&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85050274036&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1089/cap.2017.0105
DO - 10.1089/cap.2017.0105
M3 - Article
C2 - 29652529
AN - SCOPUS:85050274036
SN - 1044-5463
VL - 28
SP - 387
EP - 394
JO - Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychopharmacology
JF - Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychopharmacology
IS - 6
ER -