On Schmitt trigger and other inverters

Walid Ibrahim; Valeriu Beiu; Mihai Tache; Fekri Kharbash

doi:10.1109/ICECS.2013.6815337

On Schmitt trigger and other inverters

Walid Ibrahim, Valeriu Beiu, Mihai Tache, Fekri Kharbash

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference contribution

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper compares classical CMOS versus Schmitt trigger (ST) inverters (INVs), sized both conventionally as well as unconventionally. The reason is that ST INVs are using positive feedback (which leads to hysteresis) and are expected to exhibit much better static noise margins (SNMs) than classical CMOS INVs. That is why ST INVs are more reliable. Lately, quite a few papers have been looking at using ST INVs for implementing SRAMs focusing mainly on the ultra-low voltage/power application range. Here we are going to look at SNM, delay, power and power-delay-product over the whole voltage range for exploring the potential advantages ST could offer in advanced CMOS technology nodes, and better identify their application range.

Original language	English
Title of host publication	2013 IEEE 20th International Conference on Electronics, Circuits, and Systems, ICECS 2013
Publisher	Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
Pages	29-32
Number of pages	4
ISBN (Print)	9781479924523
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1109/ICECS.2013.6815337
Publication status	Published - 2013
Event	2013 IEEE 20th International Conference on Electronics, Circuits, and Systems, ICECS 2013 - Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates Duration: Dec 8 2013 → Dec 11 2013

Publication series

Name	Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Electronics, Circuits, and Systems

Other

Other	2013 IEEE 20th International Conference on Electronics, Circuits, and Systems, ICECS 2013
Country/Territory	United Arab Emirates
City	Abu Dhabi
Period	12/8/13 → 12/11/13

Keywords

CMOS
Schmitt trigger
inverter
sizing
static noise margin (SNM)

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Electrical and Electronic Engineering

Access to Document

10.1109/ICECS.2013.6815337

Cite this

Ibrahim, W., Beiu, V., Tache, M., & Kharbash, F. (2013). On Schmitt trigger and other inverters. In 2013 IEEE 20th International Conference on Electronics, Circuits, and Systems, ICECS 2013 (pp. 29-32). [6815337] (Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Electronics, Circuits, and Systems). Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICECS.2013.6815337

On Schmitt trigger and other inverters. / Ibrahim, Walid; Beiu, Valeriu; Tache, Mihai et al.
2013 IEEE 20th International Conference on Electronics, Circuits, and Systems, ICECS 2013. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., 2013. p. 29-32 6815337 (Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Electronics, Circuits, and Systems).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference contribution

Ibrahim, W, Beiu, V, Tache, M & Kharbash, F 2013, On Schmitt trigger and other inverters. in 2013 IEEE 20th International Conference on Electronics, Circuits, and Systems, ICECS 2013., 6815337, Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Electronics, Circuits, and Systems, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., pp. 29-32, 2013 IEEE 20th International Conference on Electronics, Circuits, and Systems, ICECS 2013, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates, 12/8/13. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICECS.2013.6815337

Ibrahim W, Beiu V, Tache M, Kharbash F. On Schmitt trigger and other inverters. In 2013 IEEE 20th International Conference on Electronics, Circuits, and Systems, ICECS 2013. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc. 2013. p. 29-32. 6815337. (Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Electronics, Circuits, and Systems). doi: 10.1109/ICECS.2013.6815337

@inproceedings{84b55eedff84419791100a74ddcf623b,

title = "On Schmitt trigger and other inverters",

abstract = "This paper compares classical CMOS versus Schmitt trigger (ST) inverters (INVs), sized both conventionally as well as unconventionally. The reason is that ST INVs are using positive feedback (which leads to hysteresis) and are expected to exhibit much better static noise margins (SNMs) than classical CMOS INVs. That is why ST INVs are more reliable. Lately, quite a few papers have been looking at using ST INVs for implementing SRAMs focusing mainly on the ultra-low voltage/power application range. Here we are going to look at SNM, delay, power and power-delay-product over the whole voltage range for exploring the potential advantages ST could offer in advanced CMOS technology nodes, and better identify their application range.",

keywords = "CMOS, Schmitt trigger, inverter, sizing, static noise margin (SNM)",

author = "Walid Ibrahim and Valeriu Beiu and Mihai Tache and Fekri Kharbash",

year = "2013",

doi = "10.1109/ICECS.2013.6815337",

language = "English",

isbn = "9781479924523",

series = "Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Electronics, Circuits, and Systems",

publisher = "Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.",

pages = "29--32",

booktitle = "2013 IEEE 20th International Conference on Electronics, Circuits, and Systems, ICECS 2013",

note = "2013 IEEE 20th International Conference on Electronics, Circuits, and Systems, ICECS 2013 ; Conference date: 08-12-2013 Through 11-12-2013",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - On Schmitt trigger and other inverters

AU - Ibrahim, Walid

AU - Beiu, Valeriu

AU - Tache, Mihai

AU - Kharbash, Fekri

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - This paper compares classical CMOS versus Schmitt trigger (ST) inverters (INVs), sized both conventionally as well as unconventionally. The reason is that ST INVs are using positive feedback (which leads to hysteresis) and are expected to exhibit much better static noise margins (SNMs) than classical CMOS INVs. That is why ST INVs are more reliable. Lately, quite a few papers have been looking at using ST INVs for implementing SRAMs focusing mainly on the ultra-low voltage/power application range. Here we are going to look at SNM, delay, power and power-delay-product over the whole voltage range for exploring the potential advantages ST could offer in advanced CMOS technology nodes, and better identify their application range.

AB - This paper compares classical CMOS versus Schmitt trigger (ST) inverters (INVs), sized both conventionally as well as unconventionally. The reason is that ST INVs are using positive feedback (which leads to hysteresis) and are expected to exhibit much better static noise margins (SNMs) than classical CMOS INVs. That is why ST INVs are more reliable. Lately, quite a few papers have been looking at using ST INVs for implementing SRAMs focusing mainly on the ultra-low voltage/power application range. Here we are going to look at SNM, delay, power and power-delay-product over the whole voltage range for exploring the potential advantages ST could offer in advanced CMOS technology nodes, and better identify their application range.

KW - CMOS

KW - Schmitt trigger

KW - inverter

KW - sizing

KW - static noise margin (SNM)

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84901439654&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84901439654&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1109/ICECS.2013.6815337

DO - 10.1109/ICECS.2013.6815337

M3 - Conference contribution

AN - SCOPUS:84901439654

SN - 9781479924523

T3 - Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Electronics, Circuits, and Systems

SP - 29

EP - 32

BT - 2013 IEEE 20th International Conference on Electronics, Circuits, and Systems, ICECS 2013

PB - Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.

T2 - 2013 IEEE 20th International Conference on Electronics, Circuits, and Systems, ICECS 2013

Y2 - 8 December 2013 through 11 December 2013

ER -

On Schmitt trigger and other inverters

Abstract

Publication series

Other

Keywords

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this