Abstract
Sorensen (2008) argued that when we see a silhouetted object, the part of the object that we see is its back surface. I argue against this claim and in favour of the thesis that the part of a silhouetted object that we see is its edge/edges. I provide a general 'Parts Perception Principle' (PPP) for determining which part/parts of a seen object are seen and show that it both provides the intuitively correct answers in cases of normal seeing and also that it favours the edge theory over the back-side-theory in cases of seeing silhouetted objects. I also briefly compare and contrast cases in which a subject can see part of a camouflaged object.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Perceptual Ephemera |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press |
| Pages | 194-218 |
| Number of pages | 25 |
| ISBN (Print) | 9780198722304 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Jul 19 2018 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Camouflage
- Causal theory of perception
- Perception
- Silhouettes
- Sorensen
- Surfaces
- Vision
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- General Arts and Humanities
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'On Silhouettes, surfaces, and Sorensen'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS