TY - JOUR
T1 - Perforated and bleeding peptic ulcer
T2 - WSES guidelines
AU - Tarasconi, Antonio
AU - Coccolini, Federico
AU - Biffl, Walter L.
AU - Tomasoni, Matteo
AU - Ansaloni, Luca
AU - Picetti, Edoardo
AU - Molfino, Sarah
AU - Shelat, Vishal
AU - Cimbanassi, Stefania
AU - Weber, Dieter G.
AU - Abu-Zidan, Fikri M.
AU - Campanile, Fabio C.
AU - Di Saverio, Salomone
AU - Baiocchi, Gian Luca
AU - Casella, Claudio
AU - Kelly, Michael D.
AU - Kirkpatrick, Andrew W.
AU - Leppaniemi, Ari
AU - Moore, Ernest E.
AU - Peitzman, Andrew
AU - Fraga, Gustavo Pereira
AU - Ceresoli, Marco
AU - Maier, Ronald V.
AU - Wani, Imtaz
AU - Pattonieri, Vittoria
AU - Perrone, Gennaro
AU - Velmahos, George
AU - Sugrue, Michael
AU - Sartelli, Massimo
AU - Kluger, Yoram
AU - Catena, Fausto
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 The Author(s).
PY - 2020/1/7
Y1 - 2020/1/7
N2 - Background : Peptic ulcer disease is common with a lifetime prevalence in the general population of 5-10% and an incidence of 0.1-0.3% per year. Despite a sharp reduction in incidence and rates of hospital admission and mortality over the past 30 years, complications are still encountered in 10-20% of these patients. Peptic ulcer disease remains a significant healthcare problem, which can consume considerable financial resources. Management may involve various subspecialties including surgeons, gastroenterologists, and radiologists. Successful management of patients with complicated peptic ulcer (CPU) involves prompt recognition, resuscitation when required, appropriate antibiotic therapy, and timely surgical/radiological treatment. Methods: The present guidelines have been developed according to the GRADE methodology. To create these guidelines, a panel of experts was designed and charged by the board of the WSES to perform a systematic review of the available literature and to provide evidence-based statements with immediate practical application. All the statements were presented and discussed during the 5th WSES Congress, and for each statement, a consensus among the WSES panel of experts was reached. Conclusions: The population considered in these guidelines is adult patients with suspected complicated peptic ulcer disease. These guidelines present evidence-based international consensus statements on the management of complicated peptic ulcer from a collaboration of a panel of experts and are intended to improve the knowledge and the awareness of physicians around the world on this specific topic. We divided our work into the two main topics, bleeding and perforated peptic ulcer, and structured it into six main topics that cover the entire management process of patients with complicated peptic ulcer, from diagnosis at ED arrival to post-discharge antimicrobial therapy, to provide an up-to-date, easy-to-use tool that can help physicians and surgeons during the decision-making process.
AB - Background : Peptic ulcer disease is common with a lifetime prevalence in the general population of 5-10% and an incidence of 0.1-0.3% per year. Despite a sharp reduction in incidence and rates of hospital admission and mortality over the past 30 years, complications are still encountered in 10-20% of these patients. Peptic ulcer disease remains a significant healthcare problem, which can consume considerable financial resources. Management may involve various subspecialties including surgeons, gastroenterologists, and radiologists. Successful management of patients with complicated peptic ulcer (CPU) involves prompt recognition, resuscitation when required, appropriate antibiotic therapy, and timely surgical/radiological treatment. Methods: The present guidelines have been developed according to the GRADE methodology. To create these guidelines, a panel of experts was designed and charged by the board of the WSES to perform a systematic review of the available literature and to provide evidence-based statements with immediate practical application. All the statements were presented and discussed during the 5th WSES Congress, and for each statement, a consensus among the WSES panel of experts was reached. Conclusions: The population considered in these guidelines is adult patients with suspected complicated peptic ulcer disease. These guidelines present evidence-based international consensus statements on the management of complicated peptic ulcer from a collaboration of a panel of experts and are intended to improve the knowledge and the awareness of physicians around the world on this specific topic. We divided our work into the two main topics, bleeding and perforated peptic ulcer, and structured it into six main topics that cover the entire management process of patients with complicated peptic ulcer, from diagnosis at ED arrival to post-discharge antimicrobial therapy, to provide an up-to-date, easy-to-use tool that can help physicians and surgeons during the decision-making process.
KW - Angiography
KW - Antibiotics
KW - Diagnosis
KW - Embolization
KW - Guidelines
KW - High-risk patients
KW - Intra-abdominal infection
KW - Non-operative management
KW - Pancreatitis
KW - Peptic ulcer
KW - Peritonitis
KW - Surgery
KW - Technique
KW - Timing
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85077758177&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85077758177&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1186/s13017-019-0283-9
DO - 10.1186/s13017-019-0283-9
M3 - Review article
C2 - 31921329
AN - SCOPUS:85077758177
SN - 1749-7922
VL - 15
JO - World Journal of Emergency Surgery
JF - World Journal of Emergency Surgery
IS - 1
M1 - 3
ER -