TY - GEN
T1 - Place making and wellbeing
T2 - 33rd International on Passive and Low Energy Architecture Conference: Design to Thrive, PLEA 2017
AU - Bleibleh, Sahera
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© Copyright 2017 NCEUB.
PY - 2017
Y1 - 2017
N2 - People mostly appropriate, and reappropriate, everyday spatial practices in time of peace as well as in time of conflict. In so doing, the "practice of everyday life" conveys much about place making and wellbeing. In wartime, home becomes a forbidden space where life is considered a collateral damage; therefore, people lose their memories and a life they once had. Place making fundamentally creates rightful environment that supports undisturbed everyday practice and equally empowers place attachment. This paper explores the ways in which people experience space disorder in warfare time when they were/are forced to evacuate and seek shelter in a temporary place not knowing when, or if they will ever be able to return home. It investigates the consequences of sudden blowing up home and its significant attributes. Following an ethnographic approach in the old town of Nablus and Jenin Refugee camp between 2010-2014, this paper discusses the spatial and behavioral disorder of war and displacement. It focuses on the impact of Israeli occupation military continuous assaults that transform the entire space of Palestinian life into a theater of war. Homes are no longer secured. The very intimate space and social life is dehumanized as the Israelis turned the Palestinian urban fabric into landscape of and for war. It also disturbed the essence of the daily life and created a "forbidden space" that contradicts the fundamental meaning of home. Such military strategy in the domestic space is meant to annihilate the everyday tactic of resistance under the occupation, which creates further struggle over the meaning of space/place thus questions the essence of place making, well being and trauma. In conclusion, peoples' narrative of place making helps us reimagine the spatial politics of emancipation in the aftermath of each attack. The resilience of space of enjoyment that arises against spaces of annihilation is a positive appropriation and transformation of forbidden space into place making. At this point, the assembling of everyday pieces into a collective space resonates with insurgent practices of temporary pleasure and create a space of joy and dominance.
AB - People mostly appropriate, and reappropriate, everyday spatial practices in time of peace as well as in time of conflict. In so doing, the "practice of everyday life" conveys much about place making and wellbeing. In wartime, home becomes a forbidden space where life is considered a collateral damage; therefore, people lose their memories and a life they once had. Place making fundamentally creates rightful environment that supports undisturbed everyday practice and equally empowers place attachment. This paper explores the ways in which people experience space disorder in warfare time when they were/are forced to evacuate and seek shelter in a temporary place not knowing when, or if they will ever be able to return home. It investigates the consequences of sudden blowing up home and its significant attributes. Following an ethnographic approach in the old town of Nablus and Jenin Refugee camp between 2010-2014, this paper discusses the spatial and behavioral disorder of war and displacement. It focuses on the impact of Israeli occupation military continuous assaults that transform the entire space of Palestinian life into a theater of war. Homes are no longer secured. The very intimate space and social life is dehumanized as the Israelis turned the Palestinian urban fabric into landscape of and for war. It also disturbed the essence of the daily life and created a "forbidden space" that contradicts the fundamental meaning of home. Such military strategy in the domestic space is meant to annihilate the everyday tactic of resistance under the occupation, which creates further struggle over the meaning of space/place thus questions the essence of place making, well being and trauma. In conclusion, peoples' narrative of place making helps us reimagine the spatial politics of emancipation in the aftermath of each attack. The resilience of space of enjoyment that arises against spaces of annihilation is a positive appropriation and transformation of forbidden space into place making. At this point, the assembling of everyday pieces into a collective space resonates with insurgent practices of temporary pleasure and create a space of joy and dominance.
KW - Everyday life
KW - Forbidden space
KW - Palestine
KW - Place making
KW - Wellbeing
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85086315614&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85086315614&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:85086315614
T3 - Proceedings of 33rd PLEA International Conference: Design to Thrive, PLEA 2017
SP - 4470
EP - 4476
BT - Proceedings of 33rd PLEA International Conference
A2 - Brotas, Luisa
A2 - Roaf, Sue
A2 - Nicol, Fergus
PB - NCEUB 2017 - Network for Comfort and Energy Use in Buildings
Y2 - 2 July 2017 through 5 July 2017
ER -