TY - JOUR
T1 - Problem-solving support and instructional sequence
T2 - impact on cognitive load and student performance
AU - Costley, Jamie
AU - Gorbunova, Anna
AU - Courtney, Matthew
AU - Chen, Ouhao
AU - Lange, Christopher
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© Instituto Universitário de Ciências Psicológicas, Sociais e da Vida 2023.
PY - 2024/9
Y1 - 2024/9
N2 - In terms of instructional sequencing and cognitive load research, it remains unclear what effect different instructional sequences have on cognitive load and how to use problem-solving support within instructional sequences to reduce cognitive load. The current study examines how instructional sequencing and problem-solving support interact with different types of cognitive load and learner performance. University students (n = 254) were randomly assigned to one of three conditions: an explicit instruction first sequence, an unsupported problem-solving first sequence, and a supported problem-solving first sequence. Results show that intrinsic load did not differ across the three conditions, extraneous load was lowest in the explicit instruction first and supported problem-solving first conditions, germane load was highest in the supported problem-solving first condition, and performance was highest in the explicit instruction first condition. Providing insight into specific ways instructional sequencing and problem-solving support can reduce cognitive load; results suggest that either problem-solving activities need support or explicit instruction is needed before problem-solving.
AB - In terms of instructional sequencing and cognitive load research, it remains unclear what effect different instructional sequences have on cognitive load and how to use problem-solving support within instructional sequences to reduce cognitive load. The current study examines how instructional sequencing and problem-solving support interact with different types of cognitive load and learner performance. University students (n = 254) were randomly assigned to one of three conditions: an explicit instruction first sequence, an unsupported problem-solving first sequence, and a supported problem-solving first sequence. Results show that intrinsic load did not differ across the three conditions, extraneous load was lowest in the explicit instruction first and supported problem-solving first conditions, germane load was highest in the supported problem-solving first condition, and performance was highest in the explicit instruction first condition. Providing insight into specific ways instructional sequencing and problem-solving support can reduce cognitive load; results suggest that either problem-solving activities need support or explicit instruction is needed before problem-solving.
KW - Cognitive load
KW - Direct instruction
KW - Instructional sequence
KW - Problem-solving
KW - Worked examples
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85175610621&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85175610621&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s10212-023-00757-7
DO - 10.1007/s10212-023-00757-7
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85175610621
SN - 0256-2928
VL - 39
SP - 1817
EP - 1840
JO - European Journal of Psychology of Education
JF - European Journal of Psychology of Education
IS - 3
ER -