Prospective randomized trial comparing alumina ceramic-on-ceramic with ceramic-on-conventional polyethylene bearings in total hip arthroplasty

Peter M. Lewis, Ali Al-Belooshi, Michael Olsen, Emil H. Schemitch, James P. Waddell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

60 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This prospective randomized study aims to compare the outcome between an alumina ceramic-on-ceramic (CC) articulation with a ceramic on ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene articulation (CP). Fifty-six hips in 55 patients with mean age 42.2 (range, 19-56) each received uncemented components, a 28-mm alumina head with randomization of acetabular liner. Mean St Michael's outcome score for each group with up to 10 years follow-up (median, 8 years; range, 1-10) was 22.8 and 22.9, respectively (P = .819). Wear was identified in all but 1 CP replacement, but only 12 of the 23 CC. Mean wear in the CP group was 0.11 mm/y and 0.02 mm/yr in the CC group (P < .001). Other than significantly greater wear in the polyethylene group, there was no significant difference in midterm outcome between the 2 groups.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)392-397
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Arthroplasty
Volume25
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2010

Keywords

  • Ceramic
  • Polyethylene
  • Total hip arthroplasty
  • Wear

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Prospective randomized trial comparing alumina ceramic-on-ceramic with ceramic-on-conventional polyethylene bearings in total hip arthroplasty'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this