Abstract
This prospective randomized study aims to compare the outcome between an alumina ceramic-on-ceramic (CC) articulation with a ceramic on ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene articulation (CP). Fifty-six hips in 55 patients with mean age 42.2 (range, 19-56) each received uncemented components, a 28-mm alumina head with randomization of acetabular liner. Mean St Michael's outcome score for each group with up to 10 years follow-up (median, 8 years; range, 1-10) was 22.8 and 22.9, respectively (P = .819). Wear was identified in all but 1 CP replacement, but only 12 of the 23 CC. Mean wear in the CP group was 0.11 mm/y and 0.02 mm/yr in the CC group (P < .001). Other than significantly greater wear in the polyethylene group, there was no significant difference in midterm outcome between the 2 groups.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 392-397 |
| Number of pages | 6 |
| Journal | Journal of Arthroplasty |
| Volume | 25 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Apr 2010 |
Keywords
- Ceramic
- Polyethylene
- Total hip arthroplasty
- Wear
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Prospective randomized trial comparing alumina ceramic-on-ceramic with ceramic-on-conventional polyethylene bearings in total hip arthroplasty'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS