TY - JOUR
T1 - Reappraisal of strain estimations and measurement methods in the Hammamat Group sediments
T2 - Comparison of primary and secondary grain fabrics with new data from Wadi Zeidun and Wadi Arak basins, CED, Egypt
AU - Fowler, A.
AU - Abdeen, M. M.
N1 - Funding Information:
We gratefully acknowledge the support and help with field work provided by Dr Ali Farrag Osman. Thanks also go to brother Mohamed Abul Khair Nouruzzaman Miah for acting as a hand model for Appendix photographs. Appendix A
PY - 2014/7
Y1 - 2014/7
N2 - In this study, pebble and sand grain shape and orientation data from undeformed and deformed conglomerates and sandstones in the Egyptian Central Eastern Desert (CED) Wadi Zeidun and Wadi Arak basins were collected, with the aim of providing more accurate tectonic strain estimations for deformed Hammamat sediments by comparing their primary and secondary sedimentary fabrics. Common assumptions about primary pebble fabrics and pebble deformation behaviour in previous strain studies of the region are shown to be invalid. This raises doubts about the accuracy of earlier reported strain estimates for the Hammamat that were based on such assumptions. For low strains in the Hammamat sediments, the best strain measurement method is normalized Fry (NFry) analysis of sand grain centre-to-centre distance data. An alternative is conventional Fry analysis of pebble ellipse centre-to-centre distance data, provided that large numbers of pebbles (~300) are used, and the pebbles form closely packed aggregates with high degrees of anticlustering. This study also provides systematic guidelines for pebble axial length and orientation measurements in the field. The progressive changes in the mechanical behaviour of pebbles with increasing bulk strain are discussed.
AB - In this study, pebble and sand grain shape and orientation data from undeformed and deformed conglomerates and sandstones in the Egyptian Central Eastern Desert (CED) Wadi Zeidun and Wadi Arak basins were collected, with the aim of providing more accurate tectonic strain estimations for deformed Hammamat sediments by comparing their primary and secondary sedimentary fabrics. Common assumptions about primary pebble fabrics and pebble deformation behaviour in previous strain studies of the region are shown to be invalid. This raises doubts about the accuracy of earlier reported strain estimates for the Hammamat that were based on such assumptions. For low strains in the Hammamat sediments, the best strain measurement method is normalized Fry (NFry) analysis of sand grain centre-to-centre distance data. An alternative is conventional Fry analysis of pebble ellipse centre-to-centre distance data, provided that large numbers of pebbles (~300) are used, and the pebbles form closely packed aggregates with high degrees of anticlustering. This study also provides systematic guidelines for pebble axial length and orientation measurements in the field. The progressive changes in the mechanical behaviour of pebbles with increasing bulk strain are discussed.
KW - Hammamat basins
KW - Strain data collection methods
KW - Strain measurement
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84898865100&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84898865100&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.precamres.2014.03.009
DO - 10.1016/j.precamres.2014.03.009
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84898865100
SN - 0301-9268
VL - 247
SP - 1
EP - 32
JO - Precambrian Research
JF - Precambrian Research
ER -