Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Remote vulnerability: Risk and geopolitically transmitted harm in the 2026 Strait of Hormuz crisis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

We introduce the concept of 'remote vulnerability' to describe how individuals and
communities are harmed by distant geopolitical events through global economic connections.
Although spatially removed from conflict, these populations suffer harm through material
linkages amplified by structural inequities and their inability to mitigate risk. This creates a
geopolitical vulnerability spectrum of three harm positions — proximate, intermediate, and
remote — each linked to the crisis through different mechanisms, transmission speeds and
policy decisions. We demonstrate that political geography need not be shared for harm to occur
and that existing crisis vocabularies are insufficient to capture remote vulnerability.
Original languageEnglish
JournalSocial Sciences and Humanities Open
DOIs
Publication statusSubmitted - Mar 2026

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 1 - No Poverty
    SDG 1 No Poverty
  2. SDG 2 - Zero Hunger
    SDG 2 Zero Hunger
  3. SDG 7 - Affordable and Clean Energy
    SDG 7 Affordable and Clean Energy
  4. SDG 8 - Decent Work and Economic Growth
    SDG 8 Decent Work and Economic Growth
  5. SDG 10 - Reduced Inequalities
    SDG 10 Reduced Inequalities
  6. SDG 16 - Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
    SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
  7. SDG 17 - Partnerships for the Goals
    SDG 17 Partnerships for the Goals

Keywords

  • remote vulnerability
  • vulnerability spectrum
  • geopolitical harm
  • risk transmission
  • food insecurity
  • permanent uncertainty

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Remote vulnerability: Risk and geopolitically transmitted harm in the 2026 Strait of Hormuz crisis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this