TY - JOUR
T1 - Renewable hydrogen production via biological and thermochemical routes
T2 - Nanomaterials, economic analysis and challenges
AU - Qureshi, Fazil
AU - Yusuf, Mohammad
AU - Tahir, Muhammad
AU - Haq, Moinul
AU - Mohamed, Montaha Mohamed Ibrahim
AU - Kamyab, Hesam
AU - Nguyen, Hong Ha T.
AU - Vo, Dai Viet N.
AU - Ibrahim, Hussameldin
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023
PY - 2023/11
Y1 - 2023/11
N2 - The urgent need to address greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, particularly in relation to climate change, is driving the demand for new sustainable renewable fuels. This demand is promoting the expansion of de-carbonization efforts, which hold tremendous potential as a renewable energy source. One area of focus is the production of hydrogen (H2), which has long been a popular subject of discussion. Currently, large quantities of H2 are generated using conventional fossil fuels. However, the finite nature of these resources has compelled the global community to explore alternative, more environmentally friendly options like biomass. Generating H2 on a large scale from various biomasses presents a complex challenge. Researchers have identified thermochemical (TC) and biological (BL) processes as the primary methods for converting biomass into H2, although other techniques exist as well. Commercializing H2 as a fuel presents significant technological, financial, and environmental hurdles. Nevertheless, nanomaterials (NMs) have shown promise in overcoming some of the obstacles associated with H2 production. This review focuses on the use of NMs in TC and BL processes for H2 generation. Additionally, the paper provides a brief overview of the methods and financial considerations involved in enhancing biomass-based H2 production. Studies indicate that the production of bio-H2 is relatively expensive. Direct bio-photolysis costs range from $2.13 kg−1 to $7.24 kg-1, indirect bio-photolysis costs range from $1.42 kg−1 to $7.54 kg−1, fermentation costs range from $7.54 kg−1 to $7.61 kg−1, biomass pyrolysis costs range from $1.77 kg−1 to $2.05 kg−1, and gasification costs $1.42 kg−1. The paper also explores various challenges related to biomass conversion and utilization for H2 production, aiming to better understand the feasibility of a biomass-based H2 economy.
AB - The urgent need to address greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, particularly in relation to climate change, is driving the demand for new sustainable renewable fuels. This demand is promoting the expansion of de-carbonization efforts, which hold tremendous potential as a renewable energy source. One area of focus is the production of hydrogen (H2), which has long been a popular subject of discussion. Currently, large quantities of H2 are generated using conventional fossil fuels. However, the finite nature of these resources has compelled the global community to explore alternative, more environmentally friendly options like biomass. Generating H2 on a large scale from various biomasses presents a complex challenge. Researchers have identified thermochemical (TC) and biological (BL) processes as the primary methods for converting biomass into H2, although other techniques exist as well. Commercializing H2 as a fuel presents significant technological, financial, and environmental hurdles. Nevertheless, nanomaterials (NMs) have shown promise in overcoming some of the obstacles associated with H2 production. This review focuses on the use of NMs in TC and BL processes for H2 generation. Additionally, the paper provides a brief overview of the methods and financial considerations involved in enhancing biomass-based H2 production. Studies indicate that the production of bio-H2 is relatively expensive. Direct bio-photolysis costs range from $2.13 kg−1 to $7.24 kg-1, indirect bio-photolysis costs range from $1.42 kg−1 to $7.54 kg−1, fermentation costs range from $7.54 kg−1 to $7.61 kg−1, biomass pyrolysis costs range from $1.77 kg−1 to $2.05 kg−1, and gasification costs $1.42 kg−1. The paper also explores various challenges related to biomass conversion and utilization for H2 production, aiming to better understand the feasibility of a biomass-based H2 economy.
KW - Biological hydrogen
KW - Economic analysis
KW - Greenhouse gases
KW - Nano-materials
KW - Thermochemical hydrogen
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85170699557
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85170699557#tab=citedBy
U2 - 10.1016/j.psep.2023.07.075
DO - 10.1016/j.psep.2023.07.075
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:85170699557
SN - 0957-5820
VL - 179
SP - 68
EP - 88
JO - Process Safety and Environmental Protection
JF - Process Safety and Environmental Protection
ER -