TY - JOUR
T1 - Rethinking pre-training
T2 - cognitive load implications for learners with varying prior knowledge
AU - Gorbunova, Anna
AU - Kapuza, Anastasiia
AU - Chen, Ouhao
AU - Costley, Jamie
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2025 Gorbunova, Kapuza, Chen and Costley.
PY - 2025
Y1 - 2025
N2 - This study examines how prior knowledge and pre-training relate to cognitive load during problem-solving. Grounded in cognitive load theory, it investigates whether pre-training facilitates learning by reducing cognitive load or imposes redundant information for learners with higher prior knowledge. In an experiment with 136 university students, pre-training was implemented through concept maps and a glossary introducing essential terms and procedures before problem-solving. Results revealed that learners with higher prior knowledge experienced lower intrinsic and extraneous load and higher germane load during problem-solving compared to learners with lower prior knowledge, suggesting enhanced schema refinement rather than redundancy. Pre-training consistently reduced extraneous load across all learners, including those with higher prior knowledge, challenging the expected expertise reversal effect. While learners with lower prior knowledge did not show significant reductions in intrinsic load, they benefited from decreased extraneous load during problem-solving. These findings highlight the value of pre-training as an instructional strategy and underscore the importance of aligning instructional design with learners’ existing knowledge.
AB - This study examines how prior knowledge and pre-training relate to cognitive load during problem-solving. Grounded in cognitive load theory, it investigates whether pre-training facilitates learning by reducing cognitive load or imposes redundant information for learners with higher prior knowledge. In an experiment with 136 university students, pre-training was implemented through concept maps and a glossary introducing essential terms and procedures before problem-solving. Results revealed that learners with higher prior knowledge experienced lower intrinsic and extraneous load and higher germane load during problem-solving compared to learners with lower prior knowledge, suggesting enhanced schema refinement rather than redundancy. Pre-training consistently reduced extraneous load across all learners, including those with higher prior knowledge, challenging the expected expertise reversal effect. While learners with lower prior knowledge did not show significant reductions in intrinsic load, they benefited from decreased extraneous load during problem-solving. These findings highlight the value of pre-training as an instructional strategy and underscore the importance of aligning instructional design with learners’ existing knowledge.
KW - cognitive load theory
KW - concept mapping
KW - expertise reversal effect
KW - instructional design
KW - pre-training
KW - prior knowledge
KW - redundancy effect
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105013629110
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105013629110#tab=citedBy
U2 - 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1628047
DO - 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1628047
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:105013629110
SN - 1664-1078
VL - 16
JO - Frontiers in Psychology
JF - Frontiers in Psychology
M1 - 1628047
ER -